189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36280721)
1. A multi-purpose, regenerable, proteome-scale, human phosphoserine resource for phosphoproteomics.
Gassaway BM; Li J; Rad R; Mintseris J; Mohler K; Levy T; Aguiar M; Beausoleil SA; Paulo JA; Rinehart J; Huttlin EL; Gygi SP
Nat Methods; 2022 Nov; 19(11):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 36280721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach.
Fermin D; Walmsley SJ; Gingras AC; Choi H; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 12(11):3409-19. PubMed ID: 23918812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score.
Savitski MM; Lemeer S; Boesche M; Lang M; Mathieson T; Bantscheff M; Kuster B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Feb; 10(2):M110.003830. PubMed ID: 21057138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Insights from the First Phosphopeptide Challenge of the MS Resource Pillar of the HUPO Human Proteome Project.
Hoopmann MR; Kusebauch U; Palmblad M; Bandeira N; Shteynberg DD; He L; Xia B; Stoychev SH; Omenn GS; Weintraub ST; Moritz RL
J Proteome Res; 2020 Dec; 19(12):4754-4765. PubMed ID: 33166149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DeepFLR facilitates false localization rate control in phosphoproteomics.
Zong Y; Wang Y; Yang Y; Zhao D; Wang X; Shen C; Qiao L
Nat Commun; 2023 Apr; 14(1):2269. PubMed ID: 37080984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.
Fischer JSDG; Dos Santos MDM; Marchini FK; Barbosa VC; Carvalho PC; Zanchin NIT
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():42-50. PubMed ID: 25623781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Occurrence and detection of phosphopeptide isomers in large-scale phosphoproteomics experiments.
Courcelles M; Bridon G; Lemieux S; Thibault P
J Proteome Res; 2012 Jul; 11(7):3753-65. PubMed ID: 22668510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing 22 Popular Phosphoproteomics Pipelines for Peptide Identification and Site Localization.
Locard-Paulet M; Bouyssié D; Froment C; Burlet-Schiltz O; Jensen LJ
J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 31975593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of alternative MS/MS and bioinformatics approaches for confident phosphorylation site localization.
Wiese H; Kuhlmann K; Wiese S; Stoepel NS; Pawlas M; Meyer HE; Stephan C; Eisenacher M; Drepper F; Warscheid B
J Proteome Res; 2014 Feb; 13(2):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24364495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Confident site localization using a simulated phosphopeptide spectral library.
Suni V; Imanishi SY; Maiolica A; Aebersold R; Corthals GL
J Proteome Res; 2015 May; 14(5):2348-59. PubMed ID: 25774671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics of cell line and tissue samples.
Kreuzer J; Edwards A; Haas W
Methods Enzymol; 2019; 626():41-65. PubMed ID: 31606085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proteomic analysis of phosphorylation in cancer.
Ruprecht B; Lemeer S
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2014 Jun; 11(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 24666026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mass spectrometry-driven phosphoproteomics: patterning the systems biology mosaic.
Jünger MA; Aebersold R
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol; 2014; 3(1):83-112. PubMed ID: 24902836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phosphopeptide enrichment using offline titanium dioxide columns for phosphoproteomics.
Yu LR; Veenstra T
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1002():93-103. PubMed ID: 23625397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative phosphoproteomics reveals evolutionary and functional conservation of phosphorylation across eukaryotes.
Boekhorst J; van Breukelen B; Heck A; Snel B
Genome Biol; 2008 Oct; 9(10):R144. PubMed ID: 18828897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A data-independent acquisition-based global phosphoproteomics system enables deep profiling.
Kitata RB; Choong WK; Tsai CF; Lin PY; Chen BS; Chang YC; Nesvizhskii AI; Sung TY; Chen YJ
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2539. PubMed ID: 33953186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confident and sensitive phosphoproteomics using combinations of collision induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation.
Collins MO; Wright JC; Jones M; Rayner JC; Choudhary JS
J Proteomics; 2014 May; 103(100):1-14. PubMed ID: 24657495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WIDENING THE BOTTLENECK OF PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS: EVOLVING STRATEGIES FOR PHOSPHOPEPTIDE ENRICHMENT.
Low TY; Mohtar MA; Lee PY; Omar N; Zhou H; Ye M
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2021 Jul; 40(4):309-333. PubMed ID: 32491218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid and reproducible phosphopeptide enrichment by tandem metal oxide affinity chromatography: application to boron deficiency induced phosphoproteomics.
Chen Y; Hoehenwarter W
Plant J; 2019 Apr; 98(2):370-384. PubMed ID: 30589143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An integrated chemical, mass spectrometric and computational strategy for (quantitative) phosphoproteomics: application to Drosophila melanogaster Kc167 cells.
Bodenmiller B; Mueller LN; Pedrioli PG; Pflieger D; Jünger MA; Eng JK; Aebersold R; Tao WA
Mol Biosyst; 2007 Apr; 3(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 17372656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]