These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization. Yagi Y; Gilbertson JR J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 15901437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A technique for automatic/interactive assessment of the proliferating fraction of neoplastic cells in solid tumors. A methodological study on the Ki-67 immunoreactive cells in human mammary carcinomas, including a comparison with the results of conventional S-phase fraction assessments by means of DNA cytometry. Parrado C; Falkmer UG; Höög A; Falkmer S; Ahrens O; Rius F; Grimelius L Gen Diagn Pathol; 1996 Mar; 141(3-4):215-27. PubMed ID: 8705786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitation and morphometric analysis of tumors by image analysis. Aziz DC; Barathur RB J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():120-5. PubMed ID: 7823583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancies in ploidy determination due to specimen sampling errors. Mesker WE; Eysackers MJ; Ouwerkerk-van Velzen MC; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem JS Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Apr; 1(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 2487516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Danque PO; Chen HB; Patil J; Jagirdar J; Orsatti G; Paronetto F Mod Pathol; 1993 May; 6(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 8346174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How thick is your section? The influence of section thickness on DNA-cytometry on histological sections. Gschwendtner A; Mairinger T Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jul; 9(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 7577752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactive morphometry: the influence of magnification. Torkkeli T; Collan Y Appl Pathol; 1989; 7(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 2706139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma. Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer assisted efficiency testing of different sampling methods for selective nuclear graphic tablet morphometry. Fleege JC; van Diest PJ; Baak JP Lab Invest; 1990 Aug; 63(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 2381167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative morphologic assessment of nuclei extracted from paraffin for DNA flow cytometry. Hendricks JB; Wilkinson EJ; Pharis PG; Sapi Z; Braylan RC Mod Pathol; 1993 Sep; 6(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 8248113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image analysis of DNA cytometry for assessing prognosis after resection of esophageal cancer]. Böttger T; Störkel S; Stöckle M; Wahl W; Heintz A; Jugenheimer M; Effenberger-Kim O; Vinh T; Junginger T Chirurg; 1991 Jun; 62(6):467-72; discussion 472-3. PubMed ID: 1655366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D reconstruction and quantitation of pathological tissues. Whimster WF; Cookson MJ; Salisbury JR Pathologica; 1995 Jun; 87(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 8570288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What's new in quantitative pathology? Past developments and outlook. Tosi P; Cottier H Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Jun; 184(6):652-5. PubMed ID: 2674919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]