BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36281128)

  • 21. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging bladder cancer: a single-institution study and a systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Soubra A; Hayward D; Dahm P; Goldfarb R; Froehlich J; Jha G; Konety BR
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1229-37. PubMed ID: 26847182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography Has High Diagnostic Value for Pelvic and Distant Staging in Patients with High-risk Penile Carcinoma.
    Ottenhof SR; Djajadiningrat RS; Versleijen MWJ; Donswijk ML; van der Noort V; Brouwer OR; Graafland NM; Vegt E; Horenblas S
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jan; 8(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 33685842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
    An YS; Lee DH; Yoon JK; Lee SJ; Kim TH; Kang DK; Kim KS; Jung YS; Yim H
    Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 24220324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology.
    Castellucci P; Perrone AM; Picchio M; Ghi T; Farsad M; Nanni C; Messa C; Meriggiola MC; Pelusi G; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fazio F; Fanti S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Aug; 28(8):589-95. PubMed ID: 17625380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical and Prognostic Value of
    Albano D; Familiari D; Fornito MC; Scalisi S; Laudicella R; Galia M; Grassedonio E; Ruggeri A; Ganduscio G; Messina M; Spada M; Midiri M; Alongi P
    Curr Radiopharm; 2020; 13(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31595860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic performance of
    Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Whole-body
    Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
    Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Johnston C; Sheehy N; Keogan M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 25015401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29.
    Lawal I; Lengana T; Ololade K; Boshomane T; Reyneke F; Modiselle M; Vorster M; Sathekge M
    Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Jun; 56(3):83-89. PubMed ID: 28154879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body
    Stahlie EHA; van der Hiel B; Bruining A; van de Wiel B; Schrage YM; Wouters MWJM; van Houdt WJ; van Akkooi ACJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1157-1162. PubMed ID: 33353826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the primary staging of rectal cancer.
    Ozis SE; Soydal C; Akyol C; Can N; Kucuk ON; Yagcı C; Erkek AB; Kuzu MA
    World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 12():26. PubMed ID: 24484935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Role of FDG-PET in the assessment of survival prognosis in melanoma.
    Pleiss C; Risse JH; Biersack HJ; Bender H
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Dec; 22(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 18158764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer.
    Adams S; Baum RP; Stuckensen T; Bitter K; Hör G
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 9724374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of
    Dolci C; Ceppi L; Guerra L; Crivellaro C; Lamanna M; Adorni M; Elisei F; Bonazzi CM; Sina F; Fruscio R; Messa C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Oct; 29(8):1298-1303. PubMed ID: 31366569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
    Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?
    Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Buchbender C; Grueneisen J; Nensa F; Sawicki LM; Ruhlmann V; Wetter A; Antoch G; Heusch P
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2017; 23(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 28089955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.
    Scher B; Seitz M; Reiser M; Hungerhuber E; Hahn K; Tiling R; Herzog P; Reiser M; Schneede P; Dresel S
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1460-5. PubMed ID: 16157528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 18F-FDG-PET in patients with malignant lymphoma having long-term follow-up: staging and restaging, and evaluation of treatment response and recurrence.
    Isohashi K; Tatsumi M; Higuchi I; Inoue A; Nakajo K; Ishikawa J; Shimosegawa E; Kanakura Y; Nakamura H; Hatazawa J
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Nov; 22(9):795-802. PubMed ID: 19039558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric neuroblastoma: comparison with 131I-MIBG scintigraphy.
    Dhull VS; Sharma P; Patel C; Kundu P; Agarwala S; Bakhshi S; Bhatnagar V; Bal C; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1007-13. PubMed ID: 26049371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic Value of
    Voskuilen CS; Schweitzer D; Jensen JB; Nielsen AM; Joniau S; Muilwijk T; Necchi A; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Briganti A; Bandini M; Goffin K; Bouchelouche K; van Werkhoven E; Shariat SF; Xylinas E; Azawi NH; Ku JH; Foerster B; van Rhijn BWG; Vegt E; Hendricksen K
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 31591037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.