These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36281341)
1. Deep learning model for predicting tunnel damages and track serviceability under seismic environment. Ansari A; Rao KS; Jain AK; Ansari A Model Earth Syst Environ; 2023; 9(1):1349-1368. PubMed ID: 36281341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peak ground acceleration prediction for on-site earthquake early warning with deep learning. Liu Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5485. PubMed ID: 38448483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation method on seismic risk of substation in strong earthquake area. Cui J; Che A; Li S; Cheng Y PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0258792. PubMed ID: 34855758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Early Warning System for Earthquake Prediction from Seismic Data Using Batch Normalized Graph Convolutional Neural Network with Attention Mechanism (BNGCNNATT). Bilal MA; Ji Y; Wang Y; Akhter MP; Yaqub M Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36080941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaking table test on the seismic response of the portal section in soft and hard rock junction. Cui G; Ma J Sci Prog; 2021; 104(3):368504211031393. PubMed ID: 34251284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GroningenNet: Deep Learning for Low-Magnitude Earthquake Detection on a Multi-Level Sensor Network. Shaheen A; Waheed UB; Fehler M; Sokol L; Hanafy S Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34884084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsupervised anomaly detection for earthquake detection on Korea high-speed trains using autoencoder-based deep learning models. Seo J; Kim Y; Ha J; Kwak D; Ko M; Yoo M Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):639. PubMed ID: 38182730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses. Kassem MM; Mohamed Nazri F; Noroozinejad Farsangi E MethodsX; 2019; 6():199-211. PubMed ID: 30766800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures. Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seismic hazard prediction of the Hunhe Fault in the Shen-Fu New District. Wang Z; Zhao B; Wan B Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14678. PubMed ID: 38918401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Technological System for Post-Earthquake Damage Scenarios Based on the Monitoring by Means of an Urban Seismic Network. Costanzo A; Falcone S; D'Alessandro A; Vitale G; Giovinazzi S; Morici M; Dall'Asta A; Buongiorno MF Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34883889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatiotemporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Earthquake Source Characterization. Zhang X; Reichard-Flynn W; Zhang M; Hirn M; Lin Y J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2022 Nov; 127(11):e2022JB024401. PubMed ID: 37033773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual Scenarios of Earthquake Early Warning to Disaster Management in Smart Cities Based on Auxiliary Classifier Generative Adversarial Networks. Ahn JK; Kim B; Ku B; Hwang EH Sensors (Basel); 2023 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 38005595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatio-temporal evolution of post-seismic landslides and debris flows: 2017 M Wang X; Mao H Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(11):15681-15702. PubMed ID: 34636012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) Technique for the Rapid Detection of Earthquake-Induced Damages Using SAR Data. Sharma RC; Tateishi R; Hara K; Nguyen HT; Gharechelou S; Nguyen LV Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 28134796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation on Rupture Initiation and Propagation of Traffic Tunnel under Seismic Excitation Based on Acoustic Emission Technology. Liu X; Zeng Y; Fan L; Peng S; Liu Q Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(12):. PubMed ID: 35746332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Feedforward Neural Network and SPT Results in the Estimation of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Triggering. Pham TA Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():1058825. PubMed ID: 34707648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Review on the Development of Earthquake Warning System Using Low-Cost Sensors in Taiwan. Wu YM; Mittal H Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Earthquake Probability Assessment for the Indian Subcontinent Using Deep Learning. Jena R; Pradhan B; Al-Amri A; Lee CW; Park HJ Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32764354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Performance and Stability of the Highway Subgrades in Seismic Events, a Case Study of the Changning Earthquake, Sichuan. Cui Z; Zhang M; Wu K; Ma H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]