144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36281473)
1. Automated analysis of computerized morphological features of cell clusters associated with malignancy on bile duct brushing whole slide images.
Monabbati S; Leo P; Bera K; Michael CW; Nezami BG; Harbhajanka A; Madabhushi A
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):6365-6378. PubMed ID: 36281473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.
Avadhani V; Hacihasanoglu E; Memis B; Pehlivanoglu B; Hanley KZ; Krishnamurti U; Krasinskas AM; Osunkoya AO; Daniels LM; Freedman AA; Goodman M; Adsay V; Reid MD
Mod Pathol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1273-1286. PubMed ID: 28664934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10-year retrospective review.
Sun T; Zuo T; Hui P; Cai G
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):558-565. PubMed ID: 35417072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Bile Duct Brush Cytology with Risk of Malignancy of Standardized Categories in the Wake of World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rath A; Pradeep I; Nigam JS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):639-649. PubMed ID: 37879315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on bile duct brushings in the presence of stent associated changes: A retrospective analysis.
Goyal A; Sharaiha RZ; Alperstein SA; Siddiqui MT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Oct; 46(10):826-832. PubMed ID: 30144340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of brush and basket cytology in differential diagnosis of bile duct stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Bang KB; Kim HJ; Park JH; Park DI; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2014 Dec; 13(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 25475865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endobiliary brush biopsy: Intra- and interobserver variation in cytological evaluation of brushings from bile duct strictures.
Adamsen S; Olsen M; Jendresen MB; Holck S; Glenthøj A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 41(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 16638704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of bile cytology associated with brush cytology of the bile duct: a comparative study of 115 patients].
Fior-Gozlan M; Bosio C; Croset C; Bichard P
Ann Pathol; 2006 Oct; 26(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 17255924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of endoscopic transpapillary brushing cytology for the diagnosis of bile duct cancer based on the histopathologic findings.
Sasaki Y; Okabe Y; Ishida Y; Taira T; Yasumoto M; Kuraoka K; Naito Y; Nakayama M; Tsuruta O; Sata M
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Sep; 59(9):2314-9. PubMed ID: 24748227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
