145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36281473)
21. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Khalid A; Pal R; Sasatomi E; Swalsky P; Slivka A; Whitcomb D; Finkelstein S
Gut; 2004 Dec; 53(12):1860-5. PubMed ID: 15542529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability.
Waugh MS; Guy CD; Maygarden SJ; Livasy CA; Jones CK; Volmar KE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Sep; 36(9):651-6. PubMed ID: 18677761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures.
Trent V; Khurana KK; Pisharodi LR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):712-5. PubMed ID: 10420229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification of factors predictive of malignancy in patients with atypical biliary brushing results obtained via ERCP.
Witt BL; Kristen Hilden RN; Scaife C; Chadwick B; Layfield L; Cory Johnston W; Safaee M; Siddiqui A; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):682-8. PubMed ID: 23008113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
Rosenbaum MW; Arpin R; Limbocker J; Casey B; Le L; Dudley J; Iafrate AJ; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):520-527. PubMed ID: 32839152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of brush cytology in biliopancreatic strictures: a single-center cohort study.
Ding SM; Lu AL; Xu BQ; Shi SH; Edoo MIA; Zheng SS; Li QY
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520987771. PubMed ID: 33557655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biliary cytology: A diagnostic tree for adenocarcinoma based on a cohort of 135 patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for stenosis of the extrahepatic bile duct.
Giovannini D; Bailly A; Seigneurin A; Fior-Gozlan M; Eyraud PY; Roth G; Laverrière MH; McLeer A; Sturm N
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jun; 130(6):433-442. PubMed ID: 35254731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening primary sclerosing cholangitis and biliary dysplasia with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and brush cytology: risk factors for biliary neoplasia.
Boyd S; Tenca A; Jokelainen K; Mustonen H; Krogerus L; Arola J; Färkkilä MA
Endoscopy; 2016 May; 48(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 26808393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
de Bellis M; Fogel EL; Sherman S; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Younger C; Cramer H; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 12872082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The outcomes of "atypical" and "suspicious" bile duct brushings in the identification of pancreaticobiliary tumors: Follow-up analysis of surgical resection specimens.
Choi WT; Swanson PE; Grieco VS; Wang D; Westerhoff M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 26221777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
