These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36281882)

  • 21. Rationality as the end of thought.
    Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e223. PubMed ID: 36281847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why framing effects can be rational.
    Kühberger A
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e231. PubMed ID: 36281892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations.
    Guala F
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e229. PubMed ID: 36281852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biases and suboptimal choice by animals suggest that framing effects may be ubiquitous.
    Zentall TR
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e246. PubMed ID: 36281875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "
    Kremling A; Bruns F; Schildmann J
    Am J Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(3):66-67. PubMed ID: 31543047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A reputational perspective on rational framing effects.
    Dorison CA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e226. PubMed ID: 36281850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Loan forbearance takeup in the Covid-era - The role of time preferences and locus of control.
    Berlinger E; Kiss HJ; Khayouti S
    Financ Res Lett; 2022 Dec; 50():103250. PubMed ID: 35996558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ceteris paribus laws.
    van Brakel J
    Behav Brain Sci; 1992 Sep; 15(3):584-5. PubMed ID: 24924073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How
    Kittay EF
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2017; 27(2):185-215. PubMed ID: 28736419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ceteris paribus and nomograms in medicine.
    Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1287-9. PubMed ID: 17499913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Explaining bias with bias.
    Przybyszewski K; Rutkowska D; Białek M
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e237. PubMed ID: 36281856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A framing effect of intertemporal and spatial choice.
    Kuang Y; Huang YN; Li S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1298-1320. PubMed ID: 35848147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guest editorial: of economists and economics, ceteris paribus.
    Rosenthal G
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1979; 57(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 257197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rational framing effects and morally valid reasons.
    Żuradzki T
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e247. PubMed ID: 36281885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The ecological benefits of being irrationally moral.
    Sirgiovanni E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 Oct; 45():e241. PubMed ID: 36281855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does It Matter How You Ask? Assessing the Impact of Failure or Effectiveness Framing on Preferences for Antibiotic Treatments in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Smith IP; Ancillotti M; de Bekker-Grob EW; Veldwijk J
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2022; 16():2921-2936. PubMed ID: 36324822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Violinists, demandingness, and the impairment argument against abortion.
    Crummett D
    Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):214-220. PubMed ID: 31782822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Fielding H. Garrison Lecture: Ceteris paribus: the evolution of the clinical trial.
    Lilienfeld AM
    Bull Hist Med; 1982; 56(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 7046852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fine-tuning the impairment argument.
    Blackshaw BP; Hendricks P
    J Med Ethics; 2021 Sep; 47(9):641-642. PubMed ID: 33172908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who's been framed? Framing effects are reduced in financial gambles made for others.
    Ziegler FV; Tunney RJ
    BMC Psychol; 2015; 3(1):9. PubMed ID: 25870764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.