192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36285103)
1. Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Shue J; Pumberger M; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
J Spine Surg; 2022 Sep; 8(3):323-332. PubMed ID: 36285103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Chahlavi A
Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.
Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD
Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Zhu C; He M; Mao L; Yang H; Hu B; Zhang L; Feng G; Liu L; Song Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):918. PubMed ID: 34724952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies.
Patel NA; O’Bryant S; Rogers CD; Boyett CK; Chakravarti S; Gendreau J; Brown NJ; Pennington ZA; Hatcher NB; Kuo C; Diaz-Aguilar LD; Pham MH
Neurospine; 2023 Jun; 20(2):451-463. PubMed ID: 37401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Yang JJ; Kim DM; Park S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37419312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Li S; Li X; Bai X; Wang Y; Han P; Li H
Exp Ther Med; 2023 Jun; 25(6):305. PubMed ID: 37229321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Kim DY; Kwon OH; Park JY
Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 36203279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar interbody fusion rates with 3D-printed lamellar titanium cages using a silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone graft.
Mokawem M; Katzouraki G; Harman CL; Lee R
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 68():134-139. PubMed ID: 31351704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
