These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3628526)
21. Hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in working memory for nonspatial stimuli. Raffaele KC; Olton DS Behav Neurosci; 1988 Jun; 102(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 3395446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of lesions to the fornix and dorsomedial thalamus on concurrent discrimination learning by rats. Hunt PR; Neave N; Shaw C; Aggleton JP Behav Brain Res; 1994 Jun; 62(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 7945970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The hippocampus, context, and information processing. Winocur G; Gilbert M Behav Neural Biol; 1984 Jan; 40(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 6732705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Selective fimbria lesions impair acquisition of working and reference memory of rats in a complex spatial discrimination task. van der Staay FJ; Raaijmakers WG; Lammers AJ; Tonnaer JA Behav Brain Res; 1989 Mar; 32(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 2923658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Normal learning set and facilitation of reversal learning in rats with combined fornix-amygdala lesions: implications for preserved learning abilities in amnesia. Fagan A; Eichenbaum H; Cohen N Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1985; 444():510-2. PubMed ID: 3860112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The septo-hippocampal system and cognitive mapping. Rawlins JN; Olton DS Behav Brain Res; 1982 Aug; 5(4):331-58. PubMed ID: 7126316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selective fimbria and thalamic lesions differentially impair forms of working memory in rats. M'Harzi M; Jarrard LE; Willig F; Palacios A; Delacour J Behav Neural Biol; 1991 Nov; 56(3):221-39. PubMed ID: 1759943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory. Sutherland RJ; Rodriguez AJ Behav Brain Res; 1989 Apr; 32(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 2496702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the role of hippocampal connections in the performance of place and cue tasks: comparisons with damage to hippocampus. Jarrard LE; Okaichi H; Steward O; Goldschmidt RB Behav Neurosci; 1984 Dec; 98(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 6439229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hippocampal function required for nonspatial working memory. Olton DS; Feustle WA Exp Brain Res; 1981; 41(3-4):380-9. PubMed ID: 7215498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations. McDonald RJ; Murphy RA; Guarraci FA; Gortler JR; White NM; Baker AG Hippocampus; 1997; 7(4):371-88. PubMed ID: 9287077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rats with fimbria-fornix lesions can acquire and retain a visual-tactile transwitching (configural) task. Whishaw IQ; Tomie JA Behav Neurosci; 1995 Aug; 109(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 7576204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Object discrimination by rats: the role of frontal and hippocampal systems in retention and reversal. Becker JT; Olton DS Physiol Behav; 1980 Jan; 24(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 7384248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Complete transection of the fornix and reversal of position habit in the rat. Hirsh R; Segal M Physiol Behav; 1972 Jun; 8(6):1051-4. PubMed ID: 5074016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of orbitofrontal, infralimbic and prelimbic cortical lesions on serial spatial reversal learning in the rat. Boulougouris V; Dalley JW; Robbins TW Behav Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 17337305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in behavioural flexibility and posttraumatic functional recovery: reversal learning and set-shifting in rats. Malá H; Andersen LG; Christensen RF; Felbinger A; Hagstrøm J; Meder D; Pearce H; Mogensen J Brain Res Bull; 2015 Jul; 116():34-44. PubMed ID: 26033702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Differential involvement of anterior and posterior cingulate cortices in spatial discriminative learning in a T-maze in mice. Meunier M; Jaffard R; Destrade C Behav Brain Res; 1991 Aug; 44(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 1751004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal lesions in rats: effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning and memory. Cassel JC; Cassel S; Galani R; Kelche C; Will B; Jarrard L Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1998 Jan; 69(1):22-45. PubMed ID: 9521808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retention of individual spatial reversal problems in rats with nigral, caudoputamenal, and reticular formation lesions. Thompson R; Yang S Behav Neural Biol; 1982 Jan; 34(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 7073639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Normal olfactory discrimination learning set and facilitation of reversal learning after medial-temporal damage in rats: implications for an account of preserved learning abilities in amnesia. Eichenbaum H; Fagan A; Cohen NJ J Neurosci; 1986 Jul; 6(7):1876-84. PubMed ID: 3734866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]