183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36286295)
1. Comparison of Six Different Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance Modalities.
Hu M; Tan J; Yang Y
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2022 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 36286295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Outcomes Following Hemodynamic Parameter or Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents: An Updated Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 28 Randomized Trials and 11,860 Patients.
Hu MJ; Tan JS; Yin L; Zhao YY; Gao XJ; Yang JG; Yang YJ
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():860189. PubMed ID: 35722113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.
Buccheri S; Franchina G; Romano S; Puglisi S; Venuti G; D'Arrigo P; Francaviglia B; Scalia M; Condorelli A; Barbanti M; Capranzano P; Tamburino C; Capodanno D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(24):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 29153502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between functional and intravascular imaging approaches guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized and propensity matching studies.
Iannaccone M; Abdirashid M; Annone U; Saint-Hilary G; Meier P; Chieffo A; Chen S; di Mario C; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; De Benedictis M; Rettegno S; Doronzo B; Gasparini M; Rinaldi M; D'Amico M; D'Ascenzo F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 31400061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Racial Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yan PF; Liu L; Yuan J; Xu CX; Song D; Yan H
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 203():193-202. PubMed ID: 37499599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided coronary drug eluting stent implantation in long
Wang S; Liang C; Wang Y; Sun S; Wang Y; Suo M; Ye M; Li X; Liu X; Zhang M; Wu X
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():944143. PubMed ID: 35990932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention.
Kuno T; Kiyohara Y; Maehara A; Ueyama HA; Kampaktsis PN; Takagi H; Mehran R; Stone GW; Bhatt DL; Mintz GS; Bangalore S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 82(23):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 37995152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared with other imaging guidance: a meta-analysis.
Kuku KO; Ekanem E; Azizi V; Melaku G; Bui A; Meirovich YF; Dheendsa A; Beyene S; Hideo-Kajita A; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 29151138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Park DY; An S; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Yadav N; Gutierrez JA; Nanna MG; Rao SV; Vij A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 37483068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Bavishi C; Sardar P; Chatterjee S; Khan AR; Shah A; Ather S; Lemos PA; Moreno P; Stone GW
Am Heart J; 2017 Mar; 185():26-34. PubMed ID: 28267472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary angiography: A meta regression-based analysis.
Sattar Y; Abdul Razzack A; Kompella R; Alhajri N; Arshad J; Ullah W; Zghouzi M; Mir T; Power D; Qureshi WT; Aljaroudi W; Elgendy IY; Mamas MA; Alraies MC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 34668640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chugh Y; Buttar R; Kwan T; Vemmou E; Karacsonyi J; Nikolakopoulos I; Garcia S; Goessl M; Wang Y; Chavez I; Poulose A; Burke MN; Brilakis ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 34(4):E310-E318. PubMed ID: 35366225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network meta-analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization.
Verardi R; Fioravanti F; Barbero U; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Rinaldi M; Escaned J; D'Ascenzo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 30136420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Groenland FTW; Neleman T; Kakar H; Scoccia A; Ziedses des Plantes AC; Clephas PRD; Chatterjee S; Zhu M; den Dekker WK; Diletti R; Zijlstra F; Mahmoud KD; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 353():35-42. PubMed ID: 35041893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.
Muramatsu T; Ozaki Y; Nanasato M; Ishikawa M; Nagasaka R; Ohota M; Hashimoto Y; Yoshiki Y; Takatsu H; Ito K; Kamiya H; Yoshida Y; Murohara T; Izawa H;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009314. PubMed ID: 33106049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
