These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36286295)

  • 21. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
    Otake H; Kubo T; Takahashi H; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Akasaka T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-Year Major Clinical Outcomes of Angiography-Guided Single Stenting Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Rha SW; Choi BG; Shim M; Choi SY; Byun JK; Li H; Kim W; Kang JH; Choi JY; Park EJ; Park SH; Lee S; Na JO; Choi CU; Lim HE; Kim EJ; Park CG; Seo HS; Oh DJ
    Int Heart J; 2017 Oct; 58(5):704-713. PubMed ID: 28966331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Şaylık F; Hayıroglu Mİ; Akbulut T; Çınar T
    Angiology; 2023 Aug; ():33197231198674. PubMed ID: 37644871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.
    Kim N; Lee JH; Jang SY; Bae MH; Yang DH; Park HS; Cho Y; Jeong MH; Park JS; Kim HS; Hur SH; Seong IW; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Chae SC;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 95(4):696-703. PubMed ID: 31132217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve use in acute myocardial infarction.
    Vallabhajosyula S; El Hajj SC; Bell MR; Prasad A; Lerman A; Rihal CS; Holmes DR; Barsness GW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):E59-E66. PubMed ID: 31724274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    ; Lee JM; Choi KH; Koo BK; Dehbi HM; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Cook CM; Al-Lamee R; Petraco R; Sen S; Malik IS; Nijjer SS; Mejía-Rentería H; Alegria-Barrero E; Alghamdi A; Altman J; Baptista SB; Bhindi R; Bojara W; Brugaletta S; Silva PC; Di Mario C; Erglis A; Gerber RT; Going O; Härle T; Hellig F; Indolfi C; Janssens L; Jeremias A; Kharbanda RK; Khashaba A; Kikuta Y; Krackhardt F; Laine M; Lehman SJ; Matsuo H; Meuwissen M; Niccoli G; Piek JJ; Ribichini F; Samady H; Sapontis J; Seto AH; Sezer M; Sharp ASP; Singh J; Takashima H; Talwar S; Tanaka N; Tang K; Van Belle E; van Royen N; Vinhas H; Vrints CJ; Walters D; Yokoi H; Samuels B; Buller C; Patel MR; Serruys P; Escaned J; Davies JE
    JAMA Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 4(9):857-864. PubMed ID: 31314045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optical coherence tomography compared with fractional flow reserve guided approach in acute coronary syndromes: A propensity matched analysis.
    D'Ascenzo F; Iannaccone M; De Filippo O; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Zilio F; Ugo F; Cerrato E; Fineschi M; Mancone M; Rigattieri S; Amabile N; Ferlini M; Sardella G; Cresti A; Barbero U; Motreff P; Colombo F; Colangelo S; Garbo R; Biondi-Zoccai G; Tamburino C; Montefusco A; Omedè P; Moretti C; D'amico M; Souteyrand G; Gaita F; Limbruno U; Picchi A
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 244():54-58. PubMed ID: 28629622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.
    Puymirat E; Peace A; Mangiacapra F; Conte M; Ntarladimas Y; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wijns W; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22319067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. One-year clinical outcome of angiography, fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
    Baumann S; Mueller KSE; Hetjens S; Eder F; Schaefer AC; Becher T; Borggrefe M; Akin I; Loßnitzer D
    Exp Ther Med; 2019 Mar; 17(3):1939-1951. PubMed ID: 30783470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Fractional FLow Reserve And Intravascular ultrasound-guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical OUtcomes in Patients with InteRmediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR): Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial.
    Kang J; Koo BK; Hu X; Lee JM; Hahn JY; Yang HM; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Lee BK; Ahn C; Wang J; Tahk SJ
    Am Heart J; 2018 May; 199():7-12. PubMed ID: 29754669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy based on gray-zone fractional flow reserve in stable angina patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (COMFORTABLE prospective study): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kitabata H; Kubo T; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Ino Y; Tanimoto T; Hayashi Y; Komukai K; Sougawa H; Kimura K; Gohda M; Hashizume T; Obana M; Maeda K; Yamaguchi J; Akasaka T
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30691507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Akasaka T
    J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 68(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 26763605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization directed by high-definition intravascular ultrasound versus standard of care: Rationale and study design of the prospective randomized FFR-REACT trial.
    van Zandvoort LJC; Masdjedi K; Tovar Forero MN; Lenzen MJ; Ligthart J; Diletti R; Lemmert ME; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PPT; Zijlstra F; van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Am Heart J; 2019 Jul; 213():66-72. PubMed ID: 31128504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves clinical outcomes during implantation of both first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.
    Nerlekar N; Cheshire CJ; Verma KP; Ihdayhid AR; McCormick LM; Cameron JD; Bennett MR; Malaiapan Y; Meredith IT; Brown AJ
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jan; 12(13):1632-1642. PubMed ID: 27840327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Utility of Imaging Modalities in Coronary Lesions With Borderline Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Bhatt H; Dayanand S; Castellanos JM; Kalra S; Janzer S; George JC
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1405-1410. PubMed ID: 32467071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical usefulness of instantaneous wave-free ratio for the evaluation of coronary artery lesion with prior myocardial infarction: A multi-center study.
    Fukuoka S; Kurita T; Takasaki A; Nakata T; Fujimoto N; Masuda J; Hoshino K; Tanigawa T; Koyabu S; Ito M; Dohi K
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2020 Feb; 26():100431. PubMed ID: 31890864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between instantaneous wave-free ratio versus morphometric assessments by intracoronary imaging.
    Matsushita K; Hibi K; Okada K; Sakamaki K; Akiyama E; Kimura Y; Matsuzawa Y; Maejima N; Iwahashi N; Tsukahara K; Kosuge M; Ebina T; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Tamura K; Kimura K
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Jun; 34(6):926-935. PubMed ID: 30535756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.