These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3628795)
1. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Jahanshahi R; Gold RH; Arndt RD; Linsman J Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3628795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Film-screen mammography: comparison of views. Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Gold RH; Jahanshahi R J Natl Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 81(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 2738948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress. Muir BB; Kirkpatrick AE; Roberts MM; Duffy SW Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6701330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: recall rates using two views compared with the oblique view alone. Haiart DC; Kirkpatrick AE Br J Clin Pract; 1990 Jun; 44(6):213-5. PubMed ID: 2206812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast. Ikeda DM; Sickles EA Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening. Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old. Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma. DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Shaffer K; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Rolfs AT Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):341-3. PubMed ID: 8596828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective use of the oblique projection in mammography. Hall FM; Berenberg AL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 98991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mammographic diagnosis based on oblique projection. Personal experience]. Gozzi G; Vidali C; Polonio G; Cressa C; Sabella M Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 3375480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading. Thurfjell E Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 8011383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic follow-up of nonpalpable low-suspicion breast abnormalities: one versus two views. Datoc PD; Hayes CW; Conway WF; Bosch HA; Neal MP Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 2068300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views. Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast radiography using the oblique projection. Bassett LW; Gold RH Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):585-7. PubMed ID: 6622708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results. Johnson JM; Johnson AK; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Hotaling EN; Herschorn SD Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Leung JW; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]