These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36288569)

  • 1. Preliminary design and evaluation of a generic surgical scope adapter.
    Khorasani M; Abdurahiman N; Padhan J; Zhao H; Al-Ansari A; Becker AT; Navkar N
    Int J Med Robot; 2023 Apr; 19(2):e2475. PubMed ID: 36288569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review.
    Hamza H; Baez VM; Al-Ansari A; Becker AT; Navkar NV
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4193-4223. PubMed ID: 36971815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generic scope actuation system for flexible endoscopes.
    Basha S; Khorasani M; Abdurahiman N; Padhan J; Baez V; Al-Ansari A; Tsiamyrtzis P; Becker AT; Navkar NV
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 38066193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel method to objectively assess robotic assistance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Ngu JC; Teo NZ
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2251. PubMed ID: 33686793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scope actuation system for articulated laparoscopes.
    Abdurahiman N; Khorasani M; Padhan J; Baez VM; Al-Ansari A; Tsiamyrtzis P; Becker AT; Navkar NV
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2404-2413. PubMed ID: 36750488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.
    Kudo T; Kanaji S; Harada H; Ohmura Y; Sawada R; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Kakeji Y
    Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 36788211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
    Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic assistance is technically superior to conventional laparoscopy in hemicolectomies.
    Ngu JC; Teo NZ
    Int J Med Robot; 2022 Jun; 18(3):e2367. PubMed ID: 35015929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concept design of robotic modules for needlescopic surgery.
    Sen S; Harada K; Hewitt Z; Susilo E; Kobayashi E; Sakuma I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Aug; 26(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 28635406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery?
    Ali JM; Lam K; Coonar AS
    Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 29938603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single assistant versus dual assistant robotic surgery for robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using da Vinci Xi or X.
    Ito H; Yanagida S; Toyonaga Y; Yamashita H; Ohori M; Isaka K
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Dec; 17(6):e2315. PubMed ID: 34312964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fine orientation control of an insertable robotic camera system for single incision laparoscopic surgery.
    Yazdanpanah Abdolmalaki R; Liu X; Mancini GJ; Tan J
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1957. PubMed ID: 30168885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients.
    Wehrmann S; Tischendorf K; Mehlhorn T; Lorenz A; Gündel M; Rudolph H; Mirow L
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):528-534. PubMed ID: 36002682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes.
    Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
    Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
    Sunkara S; Guan X
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotics and future technical developments in pediatric urology.
    Esposito C; Autorino G; Castagnetti M; Cerulo M; Coppola V; Cardone R; Esposito G; Borgogni R; Escolino M
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(4):151082. PubMed ID: 34412879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ergonomic comfort workspace analysis of master manipulator for robotic laparoscopic surgery with motion scaled teleoperation system.
    Kang D; Kwon DS
    Int J Med Robot; 2022 Dec; 18(6):e2448. PubMed ID: 35986717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel compliant surgical robot: Preliminary design analysis.
    Kapsalyamov A; Hussain S; Jamwal PK
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Dec; 17(3):1944-1958. PubMed ID: 32233517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.