165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36288687)
1. Incorporating strategy in hybrid surgery for continuous two-level cervical spondylosis from a biomechanical perspective.
Tang B; Yang J; Zhang Y; Ren X; Jiang T; Mo Z; Fan Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107193. PubMed ID: 36288687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Ke W; Wang B; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y; Rong X; Ding C; Chen H
Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Effect of C
Zhou JM; Guo X; Kang L; Zhao R; Yang XT; Fu YB; Xue Y
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 33942538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Zhao F; Rahman WU; Dong T; Yang G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Jan; 238(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 38102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers.
Liu B; Zeng Z; Hoof TV; Kalala JP; Liu Z; Wu B
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Apr; 21():1031-7. PubMed ID: 25853772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Biomechanical Changes After Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy at C5-C6: A Finite Element-Based Study.
Yuchi CX; Sun G; Chen C; Liu G; Zhao D; Yang H; Xu B; Deng S; Ma X; Du CF; Yang Q
World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e905-e911. PubMed ID: 31096026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Wang BY; Rong X; Hong Y; Ding C; Chen H; Liu H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 30704444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External and internal responses of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element modeling study.
Purushothaman Y; Yoganandan N; Jebaseelan D; Choi H; Baisden J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jun; 106():103735. PubMed ID: 32321632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects of hybrid constructions in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical spondylopathy: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Zhang Q; Cao L; Wang J; Huang J; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Song Z; Tang W; Chen Y; Sun S; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jan; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 36658557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
