These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36289451)

  • 21. On the design and the analysis of stratified biomarker trials in the presence of measurement error.
    Halabi S; Lin CY; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(12):2783-2799. PubMed ID: 33724513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interval and point estimation in adaptive Phase II trials with binary endpoint.
    Nhacolo A; Brannath W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2635-2648. PubMed ID: 29921157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-stage screened selection designs for randomized phase II trials with time-to-event endpoints.
    Wu J; Pan H; Hsu CW
    Biom J; 2022 Oct; 64(7):1207-1218. PubMed ID: 35661226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomized phase II trials: a long-term investment with promising returns.
    Sharma MR; Stadler WM; Ratain MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1093-100. PubMed ID: 21709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-stage phase II oncology designs using short-term endpoints for early stopping.
    Kunz CU; Wason JM; Kieser M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1671-1683. PubMed ID: 26037529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian basket trial design with false-discovery rate control.
    Zabor EC; Kane MJ; Roychoudhury S; Nie L; Hobbs BP
    Clin Trials; 2022 Jun; 19(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 35128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrated phase II/III clinical trials in oncology: a case study.
    Wang M; Dignam JJ; Zhang QE; DeGroot JF; Mehta MP; Hunsberger S
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 23180870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phase II cancer clinical trials for biomarker-guided treatments.
    Jung SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):256-263. PubMed ID: 28902567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the flexibility and efficiency of phase II designs for oncology trials.
    Englert S; Kieser M
    Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):886-92. PubMed ID: 22150825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bias in retrospective analyses of biomarker effect using data from an outcome-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ji L; McShane LM; Krailo M; Sposto R
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 31581815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomarker enrichment considerations in oncology early development single-arm studies.
    Tian H; Liu K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 28934023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II oncology trials with two binary endpoints.
    Kunz CU; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21057719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel Bayesian adaptive design incorporating both primary and secondary endpoints for randomized IIB chemoprevention study of women at increased risk for breast cancer.
    Gajewski BJ; Kimler BF; Koestler DC; Mudaranthakam DP; Young K; Fabian CJ
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):981. PubMed ID: 36471449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of adaptive designs for single-armed phase II oncology trials.
    Kieser M; Englert S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):602-15. PubMed ID: 24905363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomarker-Stratified Phase III Clinical Trials: Enhancement with a Subgroup-Focused Sequential Design.
    Matsui S; Crowley J
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Mar; 24(5):994-1001. PubMed ID: 28887317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Englert S; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):955-68. PubMed ID: 23868324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian order constrained adaptive design for phase II clinical trials evaluating subgroup-specific treatment effect.
    Shan M; Guo B; Liu H; Li Q; Zang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 May; 32(5):885-894. PubMed ID: 36919375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An alternative phase II/III design for continuous endpoints.
    Huang WS; Liu JP; Hsiao CF
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 20186724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.