165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36290907)
21. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; JohnBull E; Trock BJ; Landis P; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1218-22. PubMed ID: 23643603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How to Pick Out the "Unreal" Gleason 3 + 3 Patients: A Nomogram for More Precise Active Surveillance Protocol in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in a Chinese Population.
Qi F; Zhu K; Cheng Y; Hua L; Cheng G
J Invest Surg; 2021 Jun; 34(6):583-589. PubMed ID: 31588824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Brachytherapy monotherapy may be sufficient for a subset of patients with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer.
King MT; Chen MH; Moran BJ; Braccioforte MH; Buzurovic I; Muralidhar V; Yang DD; Mouw KW; Devlin PM; D'Amico AV; Nguyen PL; Orio PF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):157.e15-157.e20. PubMed ID: 29276060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A high high-density lipoprotein level is associated with Gleason score upgrade in Chinese patients diagnosed with high-grade prostate carcinoma.
Lyu J; Li L; Jiang T; Wang Z; Zhu Y
BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):8. PubMed ID: 36627638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting.
Huang MM; Alam R; Gabrielson AT; Su ZT; Kassiri B; Fletcher SA; Biles MJ; Patel HD; Pavlovich CP; Schwen ZR
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 34344628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ten-Year Outcomes of Moderately Hypofractionated (70 Gy in 28 fractions) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Abu-Gheida I; Reddy CA; Kotecha R; Weller MA; Shah C; Kupelian PA; Mian O; Ciezki JP; Stephans KL; Tendulkar RD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jun; 104(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 30721720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inverse stage migration patterns in North American patients undergoing local prostate cancer treatment: a contemporary population-based update in light of the 2012 USPSTF recommendations.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Karakiewicz PI; Pompe RS; Preisser F; Zaffuto E; Dell'Oglio P; Briganti A; Nafez O; Fisch M; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
World J Urol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 29992380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical value of core length in contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Lee S; Jeong SJ; Hwang SI; Hong SK; Lee HJ; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123704. PubMed ID: 25875823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The presence of chronic inflammation in positive prostate biopsy is associated with upgrading in radical prostatectomy.
Guner E; Danacioglu YO; Arikan Y; Seker KG; Polat S; Baytekin HF; Simsek A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2021 Sep; 93(3):280-284. PubMed ID: 34839632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
