181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3629127)
1. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Rossini PM; Caramia M; Lavaroni F; Spadaro M; Floris R; Tanfani G; Zarola F; Traversa R; Marciani MG; Bernardi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis?
Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M
Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G
Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M
Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Childhood multiple sclerosis (MS): multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparative study.
Scaioli V; Rumi V; Cimino C; Angelini L
Neuropediatrics; 1991 Feb; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2038422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients.
Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G
Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Visual, early auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis (917 cases)].
Fischer C; Mauguière F; Ibañez V; Courjon J
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1986; 142(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 3787054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Acute myelopathies in young patients and multiple sclerosis. prospective study of 20 cases].
Dalecky A; Pelletier J; Chérif AA; Lévrier O; Khalil R
Rev Neurol (Paris); 1997 Oct; 153(10):569-78. PubMed ID: 9684021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging in isolated noncompressive spinal cord syndromes.
Miller DH; McDonald WI; Blumhardt LD; du Boulay GH; Halliday AM; Johnson G; Kendall BE; Kingsley DP; MacManus DG; Moseley IF
Ann Neurol; 1987 Dec; 22(6):714-23. PubMed ID: 3435080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with somatosensory testing in MS suspects.
Eisen A; Odusote K; Li D; Robertson W; Purvis S; Eisen K; Paty D
Muscle Nerve; 1987 Jun; 10(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 3614252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study of visual evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis].
Miletto G; Merlihot JM; Nezri M; Stanoyevitch JF; Pernet-Rambaud C; Houis B
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3385127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Visual evoked potentials and click-evoked brainstem potentials in early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: statistics (author's transl)].
Lehmann D; Soukos I
Nervenarzt; 1982 Jun; 53(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 7110454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of magnetic resonance and evoked potentials in patients with clinically defined multiple sclerosis].
Iriarte J; de Castro P; Gudín M; Martínez-Lage JM
Neurologia; 1991 Nov; 6(9):322-7. PubMed ID: 1809338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Hamilton-Bruce MA; Black AB; Chappell DJ; Pannall PR
Clin Exp Neurol; 1989; 26():89-97. PubMed ID: 2642142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients.
Lebrun C; Bensa C; Debouverie M; Wiertlevski S; Brassat D; de Seze J; Rumbach L; Pelletier J; Labauge P; Brochet B; Tourbah A; Clavelou P;
Arch Neurol; 2009 Jul; 66(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 19597085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Visual and acoustic evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis].
Kofler B
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 135(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 3976237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abnormal brainstem evoked potentials in diabetes mellitus. Evoked potential testings and magnetic resonance imaging.
Nakamura Y; Takahashi M; Kitaguti M; Imaoka H; Kono N; Tarui S
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 31(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 1879370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subclinical visual involvement in multiple sclerosis: a study by MRI, VEPs, frequency-doubling perimetry, standard perimetry, and contrast sensitivity.
Sisto D; Trojano M; Vetrugno M; Trabucco T; Iliceto G; Sborgia C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1264-8. PubMed ID: 15790888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria.
Simó M; Barsi P; Arányi Z
Mult Scler; 2008 May; 14(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 18208873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
