These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3629129)
1. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and other techniques in 39 multiple sclerosis patients. Comi G; Canal N; Martinelli V; Medaglini S; Locatelli T; Triulzi F; Del Maschio A; Banfi G Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 3629129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis by evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Cutler JR; Aminoff MJ; Brant-Zawadzki M Ann Neurol; 1986 Nov; 20(5):645-8. PubMed ID: 3789682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis]. Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple sclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. David P; Ristori GP; Elia M; Bartoli A; Ciervo A; Massaro AR; Carbone G Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1990 Jun; 12(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 2403026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosing multiple sclerosis? Djuric S; Djuric V; Zivkovic M; Milosevic V; Jolic M; Stamenovic J; Djordjevic G; Calixto M Neurol India; 2010; 58(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 20739788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-clinical tests for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Rossini PM; Caramia M; Lavaroni F; Spadaro M; Floris R; Tanfani G; Zarola F; Traversa R; Marciani MG; Bernardi G Riv Neurol; 1987; 57(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3629127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]