These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36291787)

  • 21. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast Density Evaluation According to BI-RADS 5th Edition on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: AI Automated Assessment Versus Human Visual Assessment.
    Tari DU; Santonastaso R; De Lucia DR; Santarsiere M; Pinto F
    J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37108994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammographic Breast Density in Pakistani Women, Factors Affecting It, and Inter-Observer Variability in Assessment.
    Fatima K; Mohsin F; Rao MO; Alvi MI
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e14050. PubMed ID: 33898136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Utility of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Two-Dimensional Synthesized Mammography Images: A Pictorial Essay.
    Hande PC; Desai SS; Arneja SK; Sathian S
    Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 31(3):678-688. PubMed ID: 34790314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Multisite Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Synthetic Mammography.
    Matthews TP; Singh S; Mombourquette B; Su J; Shah MP; Pedemonte S; Long A; Maffit D; Gurney J; Hoil RM; Ghare N; Smith D; Moore SM; Marks SC; Wahl RL
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2021 Jan; 3(1):e200015. PubMed ID: 33937850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
    Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Generalisable deep learning method for mammographic density prediction across imaging techniques and self-reported race.
    Khara G; Trivedi H; Newell MS; Patel R; Rijken T; Kecskemethy P; Glocker B
    Commun Med (Lond); 2024 Feb; 4(1):21. PubMed ID: 38374436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast tomosynthesis for the clarification of mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions can decrease follow-up examinations and enables immediate cancer diagnosis.
    Bahrs SD; Otto V; Hattermann V; Klumpp B; Hahn M; Nikolaou K; Siegmann-Luz K
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 29451022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms: a quantitative assessment.
    Tan M; Al-Shabi M; Chan WY; Thomas L; Rahmat K; Ng KH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 33447988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated volumetric breast density estimation out of digital breast tomosynthesis data: feasibility study of a new software version.
    Machida Y; Saita A; Namba H; Fukuma E
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):780. PubMed ID: 27386266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
    Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
    Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.