218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36291951)
21. Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment.
Wu A; Tang D; Wu A; Liu Y; Qian L; Zhu L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211041201. PubMed ID: 34569371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sukhikh ES; Sukhikh LG; Lushnikova PA; Tatarchenko MA; Abdelrahman AR
Phys Med; 2020 May; 73():83-88. PubMed ID: 32334401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual HDR CyberKnife treatment for localized prostatic carcinoma: dosimetry comparison with HDR brachytherapy and preliminary clinical observations.
Fuller DB; Naitoh J; Lee C; Hardy S; Jin H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Apr; 70(5):1588-97. PubMed ID: 18374232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The feasibility and efficacy of new SBRT technique HyperArc for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: noncoplanar cone-based robotic system vs. noncoplanar high-definition MLC based Linac system.
Ho HW; Yang CC; Lin HM; Chen HY; Huang CC; Wang SC; Lin YW
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 33208290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Introduction of the Technique and a Comparison of Dosimetry With Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy.
Liu ZS; Guo J; Zhao YZ; Lin X; Zhang BY; Zhang C; Wang HY; Yu L; Ren XJ; Wang TJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):768-775. PubMed ID: 28267131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A feasibility study of using advanced external beam techniques to create a vaginal cuff brachytherapy-like endometrial boost plan.
Grelewicz Z; Zerrusen B; Sathiaseelan V; Zhang H
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 28886961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy as a boost to the prostate.
Hermesse J; Biver S; Jansen N; Lenaerts E; Nickers P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):269-76. PubMed ID: 19775833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel minimally invasive dynamic-shield, intensity-modulated brachytherapy system for the treatment of cervical cancer.
Morcos M; Antaki M; Viswanathan AN; Enger SA
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32916763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy using a "hybrid" applicator combining uterine tandem and interstitial metal needles based on CT for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Liu ZS; Guo J; Lin X; Wang HY; Qiu L; Ren XJ; Li YF; Zhang BY; Wang TJ
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 27474180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can combined intracavitary/interstitial approach be an alternative to interstitial brachytherapy with the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) in computed tomography-guided adaptive brachytherapy for bulky and/or irregularly shaped gynecological tumors?
Oike T; Ohno T; Noda SE; Kiyohara H; Ando K; Shibuya K; Tamaki T; Takakusagi Y; Sato H; Nakano T
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 9():222. PubMed ID: 25319341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Voxel-Level BED Corrected Dosimetric and Radiobiological Assessment of 2 Kinds of Hybrid Radiotherapy Planning Methods for Stage III NSCLC.
Wang H; Huang Y; Chen H; Shao Y; Duan Y; Feng A; Gu H; Ma X; Xu Z; Kong Q; Zhou Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221107966. PubMed ID: 35731648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Is stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy or multicatheter HDR brachytherapy the better option dosimetrically for accelerated partial breast irradiation?
Fröhlich G; Mészáros N; Smanykó V; Stelczer G; Herein A; Polgár C; Major T
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(2):326-331. PubMed ID: 33221260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Focal salvage treatment for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: A magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy versus high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning study.
Willigenburg T; Beld E; Hes J; Lagendijk JJW; de Boer HCJ; Moerland MA; van der Voort van Zyp JRN
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15():60-65. PubMed ID: 33458327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for locally advanced cervical cancer: Oncological outcome and toxicity analysis of 4 fractionation schemes.
le Guyader M; Lam Cham Kee D; Thamphya B; Schiappa R; Gautier M; Chand-Fouche ME; Hannoun-Levi JM
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jan; 32():15-23. PubMed ID: 34816022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Practically achievable maximum high-risk clinical target volume doses in MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a planning study.
Menon G; Huang F; Sloboda R; Pearcey R; Ghosh S
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 25085455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy as an alternative to brachytherapy for definitive treatment of medically inoperable early stage endometrial cancer.
Jones R; Chen Q; Best R; Libby B; Crandley EF; Showalter TN
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jul; 9():164. PubMed ID: 25059785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sharma M; Fields EC; Todor DA
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26092424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dosimetric and planning efficiency comparison for lung SBRT: CyberKnife vs VMAT vs knowledge-based VMAT.
Yu S; Xu H; Sinclair A; Zhang X; Langner U; Mak K
Med Dosim; 2020 Winter; 45(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 32532613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comprehensive evaluation of adaptive daily planning for cervical cancer HDR brachytherapy.
Meerschaert R; Nalichowski A; Burmeister J; Paul A; Miller S; Hu Z; Zhuang L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):323-333. PubMed ID: 27929505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A dosimetric comparison for SBRT plans of localized prostate cancer between Cyberknife and Varian Truebeam STX device.
Şenişik AM; Okutan M; Çakir A; Iribaş Çelik A; Kaytan Sağlam E; Çevikbaş G; Demir B
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Feb; 192():110617. PubMed ID: 36538872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
