These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36294711)

  • 21. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology.
    Bazot M; Cortez A; Darai E; Rouger J; Chopier J; Antoine JM; Uzan S
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2427-33. PubMed ID: 11679533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.
    Fedele L; Bianchi S; Dorta M; Arcaini L; Zanotti F; Carinelli S
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jul; 58(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 1624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transvaginal Ultrasound Combined with Strain-Ratio Elastography for the Concomitant Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: A Pilot Study.
    Săsăran V; Turdean S; Mărginean C; Gliga M; Ilyes L; Grama O; Pușcașiu L
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jun; 11(13):. PubMed ID: 35807043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.
    Frank ML; Schäfer SD; Möllers M; Falkenberg MK; Braun J; Möllmann U; Strube F; Fruscalzo A; Amler S; Klockenbusch W; Schmitz R
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 26274380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The myometrial-cervical ratio (MCR): Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a novel ultrasound measurement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
    Mooney S; Roberts R; McGinnes D; Ellett L; Maher P; Ireland-Jenkin K; Stone K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Feb; 62(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 34532849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional transvaginal sonographic assessment of uterine volume as preoperative predictor of need to morcellate in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Gerges B; Mongelli M; Casikar I; Bignardi T; Condous G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):255-260. PubMed ID: 27281513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Pongpunprut S; Panburana P; Wibulpolprasert P; Waiyaput W; Sroyraya M; Chansoon T; Sophonsritsuk A
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan; 16(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 35103432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A STUDY OF UTERINE HEMODYNAMICS USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL POWER DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ADENOMYOSIS].
    Yakovenko K; Tamm T; Yakovenko Y
    Georgian Med News; 2018 Dec; (285):21-27. PubMed ID: 30702064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Value of Strain-Ratio Elastography in the Diagnosis and Differentiation of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.
    Săsăran V; Turdean S; Gliga M; Ilyes L; Grama O; Muntean M; Pușcașiu L
    J Pers Med; 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34442468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sonographic Evaluation for Endometriosis in Routine Pelvic Ultrasound.
    Piessens S; Edwards A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):265-266. PubMed ID: 31493569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art.
    Van den Bosch T; Van Schoubroeck D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 51():16-24. PubMed ID: 29506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Rasmussen CK; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):657-666. PubMed ID: 30182497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Detailed Study in Adenomyosis and Endometriosis: Evaluation of the Rate of Coexistence Between Uterine Adenomyosis and DIE According to Imaging and Histopathology Findings.
    Alborzi S; Askary E; Khorami F; Poordast T; Abdulwahid Hashim Alkhalidi B; Hamedi M; Alborzi S; Shahraki HR
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Aug; 28(8):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33725313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New Sonographic Classification of Adenomyosis: Do Type and Degree of Adenomyosis Correlate to Severity of Symptoms?
    Exacoustos C; Morosetti G; Conway F; Camilli S; Martire FG; Lazzeri L; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1308-1315. PubMed ID: 31600574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a clinical prediction model for diagnosing adenomyosis.
    Tellum T; Nygaard S; Skovholt EK; Qvigstad E; Lieng M
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Oct; 110(5):957-964.e3. PubMed ID: 30316443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach.
    Chapron C; Vannuccini S; Santulli P; Abrão MS; Carmona F; Fraser IS; Gordts S; Guo SW; Just PA; Noël JC; Pistofidis G; Van den Bosch T; Petraglia F
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):392-411. PubMed ID: 32097456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy.
    Bromley B; Shipp TD; Benacerraf B
    J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Aug; 19(8):529-34; quiz 535-6. PubMed ID: 10944038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transvaginal ultrasonography versus uterine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.
    Vercellini P; Cortesi I; De Giorgi O; Merlo D; Carinelli SG; Crosignani PG
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2884-7. PubMed ID: 9804250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
    Dueholm M; Lundorf E; Hansen ES; Sørensen JS; Ledertoug S; Olesen F
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Sep; 76(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 11532486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the safety of dienogest in women with adenomyosis: A retrospective analysis.
    Ono N; Asano R; Nagai K; Sugo Y; Nakamura T; Miyagi E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1433-1440. PubMed ID: 33590656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.