164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36299312)
41. The Effect of Cement and Screw on the Resistance of an Implant Crown Telescopically Engaged to a Hexagonal Shaped Abutment Under Compressive Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Loading.
Kwan JC; Kwan N
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 0(0):. PubMed ID: 37824120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.
DuVall NB; DeReis SP; Vandewalle KS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):522-530. PubMed ID: 33174333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Using a porcelain furnace to debond cement-retained implant crown from the abutment after screw fracture: a clinical report.
Saponaro PC; Heshmati RH; Lee DJ
J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 25316610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis.
Negahdari R; Bohlouli S; Yazdani J; Torab A; Dizaj SM
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 34019744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A finite element analysis of novel vented dental abutment geometries for cement-retained crown restorations.
Rodriguez LC; Saba JN; Meyer CA; Chung KH; Wadhwani C; Rodrigues DC
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2016 Nov; 2(2):136-145. PubMed ID: 29744160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging.
Al-Zordk W; Al-Dobaisi T; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):723-729. PubMed ID: 34411211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Effect of a CAD/CAM-Guided Template on Formation of the Screw-Access Channel for Fixed Prostheses Supported by Lingually Placed Implants.
Lee DH; Li LJ; Mai HN; Kim KR; Lee KW
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):113-115. PubMed ID: 28267816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of the Effect of Axial Wall Modification and Coping Design on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant-supported Crowns.
Derafshi R; Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Farzin M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 25973152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cementing an Implant Crown: A Novel Measurement System Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach.
Wadhwani C; Goodwin S; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 25196982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening.
Assenza B; Scarano A; Leghissa G; Carusi G; Thams U; Roman FS; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 16265854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants: An in vitro study.
Hotinski E; Dudley J
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):151-155. PubMed ID: 30006224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Peri-implant bone loss in cement- and screw-retained prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Brandão ML; Vettore MV; Vidigal Júnior GM
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 23297703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical Advantages of Angled Screw Access Channels for Implant-Supported Restorations in the Esthetic Zone.
Berridge J; Patel N; Dimalanta W; Johnson T
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex); 2021; (PB 8-21-10/11/12):18-21. PubMed ID: 34714917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Application of 3D-printed guide for locating screw access channels in cement-retained complete arch implant-supported zirconia restorations.
Bukhari A; Dahshan S; Kotina E; Zhao N; Almujel S; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36959002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
