These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36302120)
1. Sensory characterization of yellow pea and ground chicken hybrid meat burgers using static and dynamic methodologies. Barker S; McSweeney MB J Food Sci; 2022 Dec; 87(12):5390-5401. PubMed ID: 36302120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensory, emotional, and appropriateness of plant- and meat-based burgers. Sogari G; Grasso S; Caputo V; Gómez MI; Mora C; Schouteten JJ J Food Sci; 2024 May; 89(5):2974-2990. PubMed ID: 38711372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A sensory study on consumer valuation for plant-based meat alternatives: What is liked and disliked the most? Sogari G; Caputo V; Joshua Petterson A; Mora C; Boukid F Food Res Int; 2023 Jul; 169():112813. PubMed ID: 37254388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the content and size of NaCl on dynamic sensory profile and instrumental texture of beef burgers. Rios-Mera JD; Saldaña E; Cruzado-Bravo MLM; Martins MM; Patinho I; Selani MM; Valentin D; Contreras-Castillo CJ Meat Sci; 2020 Mar; 161():107992. PubMed ID: 31704475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the sensory properties of commercially available animal and plant-based burgers. Forster RA; Hassall E; Hoffman LC; Baier SK; Stokes JR; Smyth HE J Texture Stud; 2024 Jun; 55(3):e12838. PubMed ID: 38816187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumer-orientated development of hybrid beef burger and sausage analogues. Neville M; Tarrega A; Hewson L; Foster T Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Jul; 5(4):852-864. PubMed ID: 28748073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer Sensory Comparisons Among Beef, Horse, Elk, and Bison Using Preferred Attributes Elicitation and Check-All-That-Apply Methods. Popoola IO; Bruce HL; McMullen LM; Wismer WV J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 31509247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Textural and Consumer-Aided Characterisation and Acceptability of a Hybrid Meat and Plant-Based Burger Patty. Petrat-Melin B; Dam S Foods; 2023 Jun; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 37297490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using dynamic sensory techniques to determine drivers of liking in sodium and fat-reduced Bologna sausage containing functional emulsion gels. Paglarini CS; Vidal VAS; Dos Santos M; Coimbra LO; Esmerino EA; Cruz AG; Pollonio MAR Food Res Int; 2020 Jun; 132():109066. PubMed ID: 32331676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of drivers of (dis)liking based on dynamic sensory profiles: Comparison of Temporal Dominance of Sensations and Temporal Check-all-that-apply. Ares G; Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Giménez A; Castura JC Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():79-87. PubMed ID: 28290300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Profiling the novel plant-based meat alternative category: Consumer affective and sensory response in the context of perceived similarity to meat. Giezenaar C; Orr RE; Godfrey AJR; Maggs R; Foster M; Hort J Food Res Int; 2024 Jul; 188():114465. PubMed ID: 38823862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of static and dynamic sensory product characterizations based on check-all-that-apply questions with consumers. Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Zorn S; Giménez A; Castura JC; Ares G Food Res Int; 2017 Jul; 97():215-222. PubMed ID: 28578044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation into the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Eggs, as Well as Acceptance, Emotional Response, and Use. Baxter L; Dolan E; Frampton K; Richelle E; Stright A; Ritchie C; Moss R; McSweeney MB Foods; 2024 May; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 38790754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensory and hedonic impact of the replacement of synthetic antioxidant for pink pepper residue extract in chicken burger. Saldaña E; Serrano-León J; Selani MM; Contreras-Castillo CJ J Food Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 57(2):617-627. PubMed ID: 32116371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensory and Physical Characteristics of Pan Bread Fortified with Thermally Treated Split Yellow Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Flour. Fahmi R; Ryland D; Sopiwnyk E; Aliani M J Food Sci; 2019 Dec; 84(12):3735-3745. PubMed ID: 31742694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer's perception and expected liking of labels of burgers with sodium reduction and addition of mushroom flavor enhancer. Selani MM; Ramos PHB; Patinho I; França F; Harada-Padermo SDS; Contreras-Castillo CJ; Saldaña E Meat Sci; 2022 Mar; 185():108720. PubMed ID: 34896872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumer acceptance and sensory drivers of liking for high plant protein snacks. Saint-Eve A; Granda P; Legay G; Cuvelier G; Delarue J J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Jun; 99(8):3983-3991. PubMed ID: 30719740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensory product characterisations based on check-all-that-apply questions: Further insights on how the static (CATA) and dynamic (TCATA) approaches perform. Vidal L; Antúnez L; Ares G; Cuffia F; Lee PY; Le Blond M; Jaeger SR Food Res Int; 2019 Nov; 125():108510. PubMed ID: 31554131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of soaking and solvent extraction for deodorization of texturized pea protein isolate on the formulation and properties of hybrid meat patties. Flores M; Hernán A; Salvador A; Belloch C J Sci Food Agric; 2023 Apr; 103(6):2806-2814. PubMed ID: 36647301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Original burger (traditional) or burger with mushroom addition? A social representation approach to novel foods. Patinho I; Saldaña E; Selani MM; Teixeira ACB; Menegali BS; Merlo TC; Rios-Mera JD; Dargelio MDB; Rodrigues H; Contreras-Castillo CJ Food Res Int; 2021 Sep; 147():110551. PubMed ID: 34399528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]