These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36304864)

  • 1. Comparative study on consumers' choice behaviors in selecting pork in rational and irrational scenarios.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1016933. PubMed ID: 36304864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679256. PubMed ID: 34484036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumers' decoy effect when purchasing pork with traceability technologies.
    Chen M; Liu P; Wu L
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():941936. PubMed ID: 35968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer Preferences for Traceable Food with Different Functions of Safety Information Attributes: Evidence from a Menu-Based Choice Experiment in China.
    Hou B; Hou J; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute.
    Chen M; Hu E; Kuen LL; Wu L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():675554. PubMed ID: 34276494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.
    Giannetto C; Biondi V; Previti A; De Pascale A; Monti S; Alibrandi A; Zirilli A; Lanfranchi M; Pugliese M; Passantino A
    Foods; 2023 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 38231599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of traceability label trust on consumers' traceability pork purchasing behavior: Based on the moderating effect of food safety identification.
    Liu Z; Yu Z; Zhao J; Han X; Li C; Geng N; Yu M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306041. PubMed ID: 38941301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya.
    Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F
    Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
    Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.
    Zhou M; Guan B; Huang L
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compromise Effect in Food Consumer Choices in China: An Analysis on Pork Products.
    Wu L; Gong X; Chen X; Hu W
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1352. PubMed ID: 32695046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumers' Preference for the Consumption of the Fresh Black Slavonian Pig's Meat.
    Jelić Milković S; Lončarić R; Kralik I; Kristić J; Crnčan A; Djurkin Kušec I; Canavari M
    Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 36981181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Environmental Enrichment and Herbal Compounds-Supplemented Diet on Pig Carcass, Meat Quality Traits, and Consumers' Acceptability and Preference.
    Casal N; Font-I-Furnols M; Gispert M; Manteca X; Fàbrega E
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Jul; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 30013014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Imported Milk: Based on Shanghai, China.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31905802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived Value of Information Attributes: Accounting for Consumer Heterogeneous Preference and Valuation for Traceable Agri-Food.
    Liu R; Wang J; Liang J; Ma H; Liang F
    Foods; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36832785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of Consumers' Characteristics of Purchasing Farm Produce with Safety Certificates and Their Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Gao Z; Shen M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30558279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.