873 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36305795)
1. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
Rodriguez-Purata J; Gingold J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Slifkin R; Briton-Jones C; Copperman A; Sandler B
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Premature timing of progesterone luteal phase support initiation did not negatively impact live birth rates in modified natural frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Jiang WJ; Sun ZG; Song JY
Heliyon; 2023 Feb; 9(2):e13218. PubMed ID: 36793963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Length of estradiol exposure >100 pg/ml in the follicular phase affects pregnancy outcomes in natural frozen embryo transfer cycles.
Romanski PA; Bortoletto P; Liu YL; Chung PH; Rosenwaks Z
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):1932-1940. PubMed ID: 34128044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer-a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomes.
Mendes Godinho C; Soares SR; Nunes SG; Martínez JMM; Santos-Ribeiro S
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 38531673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.
Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients.
Gill P; Ata B; Arnanz A; Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Fatemi HM; Ubaldi FM; Garcia-Velasco JA; Seli E
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 38452358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.
Bourdon M; Pocate-Cheriet K; Finet de Bantel A; Grzegorczyk-Martin V; Amar Hoffet A; Arbo E; Poulain M; Santulli P
Hum Reprod; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1948-1964. PubMed ID: 31644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between endogenous LH level prior to progesterone administration and live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles of ovulatory women.
Zhou R; Zhang X; Dong M; Huang L; Zhu X; Wang S; Liu F
Hum Reprod; 2021 Sep; 36(10):2687-2696. PubMed ID: 34447994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues.
Montagut M; Santos-Ribeiro S; De Vos M; Polyzos NP; Drakopoulos P; Mackens S; van de Vijver A; van Landuyt L; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2803-2810. PubMed ID: 27798046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a prospective study.
Shah JS; Vaughan DA; Dodge LE; Leung A; Korkidakis A; Sakkas D; Ryley DA; Penzias AS; Toth TL
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(5):980-987. PubMed ID: 35357436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.
Healy MW; Yamasaki M; Patounakis G; Richter KS; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27986817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of letrozole co-treatment during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield, embryo development, and live birth rate in women with normal ovarian reserve: secondary outcomes from the RIOT trial.
Bülow NS; Warzecha AK; Nielsen MV; Andersen CY; Holt MD; Petersen MR; Sopa N; Zedeler A; Englund AL; Pinborg A; Grøndahl ML; Skouby SO; Macklon NS
Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2154-2165. PubMed ID: 37699851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer.
Groenewoud ER; Cohlen BJ; Al-Oraiby A; Brinkhuis EA; Broekmans FJ; de Bruin JP; van den Dool G; Fleisher K; Friederich J; Goddijn M; Hoek A; Hoozemans DA; Kaaijk EM; Koks CA; Laven JS; van der Linden PJ; Manger AP; Slappendel E; Spinder T; Kollen BJ; Macklon NS
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1483-92. PubMed ID: 27179265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
