These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36305911)

  • 1. Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas.
    Xanthopoulou K; Seitz B; Belin MW; Flockerzi E
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36305911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages.
    Flockerzi E; Häfner L; Xanthopoulou K; Daas L; Munteanu C; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 100(1):e83-e90. PubMed ID: 33750037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters and the Biomechanical E-Staging After Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus.
    Flockerzi E; Xanthopoulou K; Daas L; Feld S; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2022 Nov; 11(6):514-520. PubMed ID: 36417675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus.
    Vinciguerra R; Romano V; Arbabi EM; Brunner M; Willoughby CE; Batterbury M; Kaye SB
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):840-846. PubMed ID: 29227513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Biomechanical E-Staging: In Vivo Biomechanics in Keratoconus.
    Flockerzi E; Xanthopoulou K; Munteanu C; Daas L; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Jun; 240(6):761-773. PubMed ID: 37348512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus.
    Song Y; Feng Y; Qu M; Ma Q; Tian H; Li D; He R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Corneal biomechanics before and after cross-linking in patients with keratoconus].
    Feld S; Flockerzi E; Daas L; Xanthopoulou K; Sideroudi H; Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Ophthalmologie; 2023 Sep; 120(9):940-946. PubMed ID: 37043004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of Corvis ST Parameters Including Updated Stress-Strain Index in Differentiating Between Normal, Forme-Fruste, Subclinical, and Clinical Keratoconic Eyes.
    Miao YY; Ma XM; Qu ZX; Eliasy A; Wu BW; Xu H; Wang P; Zheng XB; Wang JJ; Ye YF; Chen SH; Elsheikh A; Bao FJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 258():196-207. PubMed ID: 37879454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined biomechanical and tomographic keratoconus staging: Adding a biomechanical parameter to the ABCD keratoconus staging system.
    Flockerzi E; Vinciguerra R; Belin MW; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 100(5):e1135-e1142. PubMed ID: 34655452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes.
    Yang K; Xu L; Fan Q; Gu Y; Song P; Zhang B; Zhao D; Pang C; Ren S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5676. PubMed ID: 32231236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of dynamic corneal response parameters and the biomechanical E-staging after Intacs® SK implantation in keratoconus.
    Flockerzi E; Berger T; Seitz B; Hamon L; Daas L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S495-S500. PubMed ID: 38648457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical assessment of healthy and keratoconic corneas (with/without crosslinking) using dynamic ultrahigh-speed Scheimpflug technology and the relevance of the parameter (A1L-A2L).
    Fuchsluger TA; Brettl S; Geerling G; Kaisers W; Franko Zeitz P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 29871966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal biomechanical outcome of collagen cross-linking in keratoconic patients evaluated by Corvis ST.
    Jabbarvand M; Moravvej Z; Shahraki K; Hashemian H; Ghasemi H; Berijani S; Amiri Z; Jamali A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1577-1583. PubMed ID: 32715752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of the Corvis Biomechanical Factor with tomographic parameters in keratoconus.
    Flockerzi E; Vinciguerra R; Belin MW; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Seitz B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 34321407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia with Relatively Low Keratometry.
    Esporcatte LPG; Salomão MQ; Lopes BT; Sena N; Machado AP; Vinciguerra P; Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2024 Jul; 13(7):2023-2035. PubMed ID: 38824471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical changes following corneal crosslinking in keratoconus patients.
    Felter E; Khoramnia R; Friedrich M; Son HS; Auffarth GU; Augustin VA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in chinese patients.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; Chen Y
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):339. PubMed ID: 34544392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal sublayer thickness measured by Corvis ST and UHR-OCT in keratoconus and normal eyes.
    Li Y; Xu Z; Liu Q; Wang Y; Lin K; Xia J; Chen S; Hu L
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Jan; 8(1):2. PubMed ID: 33419485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.