These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36306051)
1. Comparison of updated birth weight, length and head circumference charts by gestational age in China with the INTERGROWTH-21st NCSS charts: a population-based study. Zhang YQ; Li H; Zong XN; Wu HH World J Pediatr; 2023 Jan; 19(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 36306051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study. Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied. Estañ-Capell J; Alarcón-Torres B; Miró-Pedro M; Martínez-Costa C Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1212-e1219. PubMed ID: 36709759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term. Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Growth standard curves of birth weight, length and head circumference of Chinese newborns of different gestation]. ; Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 58(9):738-746. PubMed ID: 32872714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Villar J; Cheikh Ismail L; Victora CG; Ohuma EO; Bertino E; Altman DG; Lambert A; Papageorghiou AT; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Frederick IO; Noble AJ; Pang R; Barros FC; Chumlea C; Bhutta ZA; Kennedy SH; Lancet; 2014 Sep; 384(9946):857-68. PubMed ID: 25209487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard. Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of US Birth Weight References and the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Standard. Kozuki N; Katz J; Christian P; Lee AC; Liu L; Silveira MF; Barros F; Tielsch JM; Schmiegelow C; Sania A; Roberfroid D; Ndyomugyenyi R; Mullany LC; Mongkolchati A; Huybregts L; Humphrey J; Fawzi W; Baqui AH; Adair L; Oddo VM; Black RE; JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Jul; 169(7):e151438. PubMed ID: 26147059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants. Tuzun F; Yucesoy E; Baysal B; Kumral A; Duman N; Ozkan H J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population. Kajdy A; Modzelewski J; Filipecka-Tyczka D; Pokropek A; Rabijewski M J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):2977-2984. PubMed ID: 31619090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extrauterine growth restriction in very-low-birthweight infants: prevalence and concordance according to Fenton, Olsen, and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts in a multicenter Spanish cohort. González López C; Solís Sánchez G; Fernández Colomer B; Mantecón Fernández L; Lareu Vidal S; Arias Llorente RP; Ibáñez Fernández A; González García LG; Suárez Rodríguez M Eur J Pediatr; 2024 Sep; 183(9):4073-4083. PubMed ID: 38960906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile. Sovio U; Smith GCS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study. Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of growth curves in very low birth weight preterm infants after hospital discharge. Ribas SA; Paravidino VB; Soares FVM Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 34231052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study. Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive ability of postnatal growth failure for adverse feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants: an exploratory study comparing Fenton with INTERGROWTH-21st preterm growth charts. Viswanathan S; Osborn E; Jadcherla S J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5470-5477. PubMed ID: 33573451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of regional versus global growth charts for the classification of small-for-gestational age neonates. Anand P; Thomas D; Agarwal R; Thukral A; Deorari AK; Paul VK; Sankar MJ Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2023 Jan; 108(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 35551076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of birth weight, length, and head circumference between the BRISA-RP and Intergrowth-21st cohorts. Pimenta JRR; Grandi C; Aragon DC; Cardoso VC J Pediatr (Rio J); 2020; 96(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 31026416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]