133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36306547)
1. Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.
Lee GH; Yoon S; Nam M; Kim H; Hur M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 61(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 36306547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.
Nam M; Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Kim H; Park M; Kim HN
Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 35177560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the CellaVision DC-1 digital cell imaging analyser for differential counting and morphological classification of blood cells.
van der Vorm LN; Hendriks HA; Smits SM
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Mar; 76(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34620610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Kim HN; Hur M; Kim H; Kim SW; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
Yoon S; Hur M; Park M; Kim H; Kim SW; Lee TH; Nam M; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 33470955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. White blood cell differentials performance of a new automated digital cell morphology analyzer: Mindray MC-80.
Khongjaroensakun N; Chaothai N; Chamchomdao L; Suriyachand K; Paisooksantivatana K
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):691-699. PubMed ID: 37338111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.
Yoon S; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288551. PubMed ID: 37498851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?
Shin E; Hur M; Kim H; Lee GH; Hong MH; Nam M; Lee S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 38535013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Medica EasyCell assistant.
Kim H; Lee GH; Yoon S; Hur M; Kim HN; Park M; Kim SW
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 61(10):1858-1866. PubMed ID: 37084402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical validation of white blood cell differential and platelet assessment on the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer.
Lapić I; Miloš M; Dorotić M; Drenški V; Coen Herak D; Rogić D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):668-677. PubMed ID: 37255419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60.
Kweon OJ; Lim YK; Lee MK; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267638. PubMed ID: 35476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canine differential leukocyte counting with the CellaVision DM96Vision, Sysmex XT-2000iV, and Advia 2120 hematology analyzers and a manual method.
Tvedten HW; Lilliehöök IE
Vet Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 40(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 21884185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument.
Xiang D; Yue J; Lan Y; Sha C; Ren S; Li Y; Li M; Wang C
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 25944368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
Woo KS; Jeong IH; An GD; Lim HH; Han JY
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 31271528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complete blood count reference values of cord blood in Taiwan and the influence of gender and delivery route on them.
Chang YH; Yang SH; Wang TF; Lin TY; Yang KL; Chen SH
Pediatr Neonatol; 2011 Jun; 52(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 21703558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A New Automated Technology for Cerebrospinal Fluid Cell Counts: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Impact of GloCyte, Sysmex XN, and Manual Methods.
Sandhaus LM; Dillman CA; Hinkle WP; MacKenzie JM; Hong G
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 May; 147(5):507-514. PubMed ID: 28419185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
