170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36306588)
1. Intermediate-term oncological outcomes after a negative endorectal coil multiparametric MRI of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer.
Kamal O; Comerford J; Foster BR; Young DJ; Amling C; Coakley FV
Clin Imaging; 2022 Dec; 92():112-116. PubMed ID: 36306588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
Boschheidgen M; Schimmöller L; Doerfler S; Al-Monajjed R; Morawitz J; Ziayee F; Mally D; Quentin M; Arsov C; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6746. PubMed ID: 35469056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.
Haack M; Miksch V; Tian Z; Duwe G; Thomas A; Borkowetz A; Stroh K; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Höfner T; Boehm K
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2947-2954. PubMed ID: 36318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men across racial/ethnic groups.
Meza J; Babajide R; Saoud R; Sweis J; Abelleira J; Helenowski I; Jovanovic B; Eggener S; Miller FH; Horowitz JM; Casalino DD; Murphy AB
BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):107. PubMed ID: 35850677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilization trend of prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on prostate cancer detection: Real-world insights from a high-volume center in southwest China.
Zhang C; Tu X; Dai J; Zhang Z; Shen C; Wu Q; Liu Z; Lin T; Qiu S; Yang L; Yang L; Zhang M; Cai D; Bao Y; Zeng H; Wei Q
Prostate; 2024 May; 84(6):539-548. PubMed ID: 38173301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing detection of clinically significant prostate cancer through nomograms incorporating mri, clinical features, and advanced serum biomarkers in biopsy naïve men.
Siddiqui MR; Li EV; Kumar SKSR; Busza A; Lin JS; Mahenthiran AK; Aguiar JA; Shah PV; Ansbro B; Rich JM; Moataz SAS; Keeter MK; Mai Q; Mi X; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Patel HD; Ross AE
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Sep; 26(3):588-595. PubMed ID: 36973367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL.
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Dwivedi AK; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 28872226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A non-randomized prospective study on the diagnostic performance of perineal prostatic biopsy, directed via diffusion nuclear resonance, in patients with suspected prostate cancer and previous negative transrectal prostate biopsy.
Castellucci R; Linares Quevedo AI; Sánchez Gómez FJ; Cogollos Acuña I; Salmerón Béliz I; Muñoz Fernández de Legaría M; Salinas S; Martínez Piñeiro L
Urologia; 2021 Feb; 88(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 33054607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance.
Chen M; Wang R; Zhang T; Zhang X; Wan Y; Fu X
Future Oncol; 2022 Apr; 18(12):1473-1483. PubMed ID: 35105154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
