162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36306607)
1. Effects of an enhanced acoustic environment on residual hearing following chronic cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation in the partially deafened cat.
Wise AK; Atkinson P; Fallon JB
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108635. PubMed ID: 36306607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.
Tanaka C; Nguyen-Huynh A; Loera K; Stark G; Reiss L
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.
Reiss LA; Stark G; Nguyen-Huynh AT; Spear KA; Zhang H; Tanaka C; Li H
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation.
Irving S; Wise AK; Millard RE; Shepherd RK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2014 Aug; 11(4):046008. PubMed ID: 24921595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?
Coco A; Epp SB; Fallon JB; Xu J; Millard RE; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 17258411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of chronic implantation and long-term stimulation of a cochlear implant in the partial hearing cat model.
Fallon JB; Dueck W; Trang EP; Smyth D; Wise AK
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108470. PubMed ID: 35249777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
Kang SY; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Su GL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 19902297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients.
Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Short-term observation of electrical acoustic stimulation in patients with low frequency residual hearing after cochlear implant].
Wang RJ; Luo JF; Chao XH; Hu FX; Fan ZM; Xu L; Wang HB
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 58(12):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 38186091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length.
Lee C; Hartsock JJ; Salt AN; Lichtenhan JT
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):666-678. PubMed ID: 38178312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of neonatal partial deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on auditory and electrical response characteristics in primary auditory cortex.
Fallon JB; Shepherd RK; Brown M; Irvine DR
Hear Res; 2009 Nov; 257(1-2):93-105. PubMed ID: 19703532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
