174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36307233)
41. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography and contrast-enhanced 3D T1 sequence for detecting intracranial infectious aneurysms in infectious endocarditis.
Boukobza M; Ilic-Habensus E; Duval X; Laissy JP
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Nov; 144():110008. PubMed ID: 34742109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device.
Timsit C; Soize S; Benaissa A; Portefaix C; Gauvrit JY; Pierot L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 27102311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Concordance of Time-of-Flight MRA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Adult Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis.
de Boysson H; Boulouis G; Parienti JJ; Touzé E; Zuber M; Arquizan C; Dequatre N; Detante O; Bienvenu B; Aouba A; Guillevin L; Pagnoux C; Naggara O
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1917-1922. PubMed ID: 28751515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series.
Pierot L; Portefaix C; Boulin A; Gauvrit JY
Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2255-63. PubMed ID: 22569997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Bash S; Villablanca JP; Jahan R; Duckwiler G; Tillis M; Kidwell C; Saver J; Sayre J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 May; 26(5):1012-21. PubMed ID: 15891154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Contrast-enhanced intracranial 3 D MR angiography (CE-MRA) in assessing arterial stenoses and aneurysms].
Gottschalk S; Gaebel C; Haendler G; Gellissen J; Missler U; Seidel G; Nowak G; Petersen D
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):704-13. PubMed ID: 12063599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of 4D time-resolved MRA with keyhole and 3D time-of-flight MRA at 3.0 T for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms.
Wu Q; Li MH
BMC Neurol; 2012 Jul; 12():50. PubMed ID: 22784396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Follow-up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Endovascular Coiling: Comparison of Time-of-Flight, Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction With Radial Acquisition, and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
You SH; Kim B; Yang KS; Kim BK; Ryu J
Neurosurgery; 2021 Jan; 88(2):E179-E189. PubMed ID: 33319900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.
Greve T; Sollmann N; Hock A; Hey S; Gnanaprakasam V; Nijenhuis M; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):855-865. PubMed ID: 31664504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography.
Agid R; Willinsky RA; Lee SK; Terbrugge KG; Farb RI
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Sep; 29(8):1570-4. PubMed ID: 18499789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA combined with MRI-based vascular calcification visualization for the assessment of arterial stenosis in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease.
Varga-Szemes A; Penmetsa M; Emrich T; Todoran TM; Suranyi P; Fuller SR; Edelman RR; Koktzoglou I; Schoepf UJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2778-2787. PubMed ID: 33068186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. High-resolution three-dimensional 3 T magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of experimental aneurysm in the rabbit.
Sherif C; Marbacher S; Fandino J
Neurol Res; 2009 Oct; 31(8):869-72. PubMed ID: 19215665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. High-resolution vessel wall imaging for quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating in-stent stenosis of intracranial aneurysms.
Chen T; Liu S; Jiang Y; Wu W; Li J; Li K; Guo D
Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1381438. PubMed ID: 38784915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with the enterprise stent for cerebral aneurysms.
Takayama K; Taoka T; Nakagawa H; Myouchin K; Wada T; Sakamoto M; Fukusumi A; Iwasaki S; Kurokawa S; Kichikawa K
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):568-72. PubMed ID: 21926851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
