127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36308412)
21. Can we improve the detection of glandular cervical lesions: the role and limitations of the Pap smear diagnosis atypical glandular cells (AGC).
Duska LR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):381-2. PubMed ID: 19647129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. False-Positive Atypical Endocervical Cells in Conventional Pap Smears: Cyto-Histological Correlation and Analysis.
Pulkkinen J; Huhtala H; Kholová I
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):604-617. PubMed ID: 37562375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effectiveness of the Thin Prep Imaging System in the detection of adenocarcinoma of the gynecologic system.
Friedlander MA; Rudomina D; Lin O
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18085633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis.
Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How predictive is a cervical smear suggesting glandular neoplasia?
Mathers ME; Johnson SJ; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11952746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Histologic follow-up of atypical endocervical cells. Liquid-based, thin-layer preparation vs. conventional Pap smear.
Wang N; Emancipator SN; Rose P; Rodriguez M; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 12040636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fortuitous detection of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: a report of 2 cases.
Gurney EP; Blank SV
J Reprod Med; 2009 Jul; 54(7):451-3. PubMed ID: 19691263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.
Miller RA; Mody DR; Tams KC; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 25951104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Schoolland M; Segal A; Allpress S; Miranda A; Frost FA; Sterrett GF
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):330-7. PubMed ID: 12478680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of CellSolutions BestPrep® automated thin-layer liquid-based cytology Papanicolaou slide preparation and BestCyte® cell sorter imaging system.
Delga A; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Marée R; Lambert C; Delvenne P
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 25277345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. BD focalpoint slide profiler performance with atypical glandular cells on SurePath Papanicolaou smears.
Chute DJ; Lim H; Kong CS
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 20209621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of Pap smear in the diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Pulkkinen J; Huhtala H; Kholová I
APMIS; 2021 Apr; 129(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 33445208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of diagnosis of atypical glandular cells - Conventional and ThinPrep.
Ramsaroop R; Chu I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Sep; 34(9):614-9. PubMed ID: 16900475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].
Horn LC; Klostermann K
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32 Suppl 2():242-54. PubMed ID: 21909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative sensitivities of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smear for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and combined AIS/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL): comparison with HSIL.
Roberts JM; Thurloe JK
Cancer; 2007 Dec; 111(6):482-6. PubMed ID: 17969065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of cytological features of glandular lesions of the cervix on conventional smear preparations-a comprehensive study from a tertiary care hospital.
Mantri S; Ravikumar G; Crasta J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Mar; 49(3):388-394. PubMed ID: 33211413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests.
Xing W; Hou AY; Fischer A; Owens CL; Jiang Z
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23963870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical utility of adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing in women with Papanicolaou test findings of atypical glandular cells.
Zhao C; Florea A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jan; 134(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20073612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
