These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36308783)

  • 41. Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities.
    Olaguer EP; Knipping E; Shaw S; Ravindran S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):795-806. PubMed ID: 27191342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic implications of reducing carbon emissions from energy use and industrial processes in Brazil.
    Chen YH; Timilsina GR; Landis F
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():436-46. PubMed ID: 24184985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A step towards sustainable environment in China: The role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes.
    Hsu CC; Zhang Y; Ch P; Aqdas R; Chupradit S; Nawaz A
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113609. PubMed ID: 34467863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A factorial CGE model for analyzing the impacts of stepped carbon tax on Chinese economy and carbon emission.
    Fu Y; Huang G; Liu L; Zhai M
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 759():143512. PubMed ID: 33221012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Lancet Countdown on PM
    Cai W; Hui J; Wang C; Zheng Y; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Gong P
    Lancet Planet Health; 2018 Apr; 2(4):e151-e161. PubMed ID: 29615216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Green growth and environmental sustainability in China: the role of environmental taxes.
    Yu L; Gao X; Lyu J; Feng Y; Zhang S; Andlib Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):22702-22711. PubMed ID: 36301397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Synergistic effect of carbon ETS and carbon tax under China's peak emission target: A dynamic CGE analysis.
    Zhang Y; Qi L; Lin X; Pan H; Sharp B
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():154076. PubMed ID: 35218837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries.
    Solarin SA; Al-Mulali U; Gan GGG; Shahbaz M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(23):22641-22657. PubMed ID: 29846898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Unveiling the spatial and sectoral characteristics of a high-resolution emission inventory of CO
    Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang A; Kou W; Bo X; Cai B; Qu J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 847():157623. PubMed ID: 35901902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Energy and Environmental Assessment of Steam Management Optimization in an Ethylene Plant.
    Variny M; Hanus K; Blahušiak M; Furda P; Illés P; Janošovský J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34832022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Effect of Carbon Emission Taxes on Environmental and Economic Systems.
    Tu Z; Liu B; Jin D; Wei W; Kong J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35329391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Synergistic effect of CO
    Jia W; Li L; Lei Y; Wu S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116535. PubMed ID: 36279820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Multiscale observations of CO2, 13CO2, and pollutants at Four Corners for emission verification and attribution.
    Lindenmaier R; Dubey MK; Henderson BG; Butterfield ZT; Herman JR; Rahn T; Lee SH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(23):8386-91. PubMed ID: 24843169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: An empirical study in the context of COP-21.
    Khan SAR; Ponce P; Yu Z
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113418. PubMed ID: 34426217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Waste benefits of CO2 policies in Japan.
    Gielen DJ; Moriguchi Y
    Waste Manag Res; 2002 Feb; 20(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 12020092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Health benefits of a carbon tax.
    Cuevas S; Haines A
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10013):7-9. PubMed ID: 26686959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do transportation taxes promote pro-environmental behaviour? An empirical investigation.
    Wang L; Chen Z; Mahmood MT; Mehdi MNJ; Ullah S; Nazam M; Hafeez M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):35545-35553. PubMed ID: 36534245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Illustrative national scale scenarios of environmental and human health impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage.
    Tzanidakis K; Oxley T; Cockerill T; ApSimon H
    Environ Int; 2013 Jun; 56():48-64. PubMed ID: 23603732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.