124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36308925)
1. The impact of standardized structured reporting of pathology reports for breast cancer care.
Snoek JAA; Nagtegaal ID; Siesling S; van den Broek E; van Slooten HJ; Hugen N
Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():178-182. PubMed ID: 36308925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports.
Baranov NS; Nagtegaal ID; van Grieken NCT; Verhoeven RHA; Voorham QJM; Rosman C; van der Post RS
Virchows Arch; 2019 Aug; 475(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 31144018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of Care in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Influence of the Introduction of Standardized Structured Reporting for Pathology.
Sluijter CE; van Workum F; Wiggers T; van de Water C; Visser O; van Slooten HJ; Overbeek LIH; Nagtegaal ID
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31070983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports.
Schaad N; Berezowska S; Perren A; Hewer E
Virchows Arch; 2024 Jan; 484(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 37017774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structured reporting ensures complete content and quick detection of essential data in pathology reports of oncological breast resection specimens.
Aumann K; Niermann K; Asberger J; Wellner U; Bronsert P; Erbes T; Hauschke D; Stickeler E; Gitsch G; Kayser G; Werner M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 156(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 27059032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uptake and impact of synoptic reporting in a community care setting.
Eng JL; Baliski CR; McGahan C; Cai E
Am J Surg; 2018 May; 215(5):857-861. PubMed ID: 29496204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hormone- and HER2-receptor assessment in 33,046 breast cancer patients: a nationwide comparison of positivity rates between pathology laboratories in the Netherlands.
van Dooijeweert C; Deckers IAG; Baas IO; van der Wall E; van Diest PJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jun; 175(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 30825048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality Assessment of Gallbladder Cancer Pathology Reports: A Dutch Nationwide Study.
de Bitter TJJ; de Savornin-Lohman EAJ; de Reuver PR; Versteeg VS; Vink-Börger E; Verheij J; Nagtegaal ID; van der Post RS
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Jun; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 34198644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer.
Słodkowska J; Cierniak S; Patera J; Kopik J; Baranowski W; Markiewicz T; Murawski P; Buda I; Kozłowski W
Pathobiology; 2016; 83(2-3):70-8. PubMed ID: 27100104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synoptic operative reporting: assessing the completeness, accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of synoptic reporting for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Stogryn SE; Hardy K; Mullan MJ; Park J; Andrew C; Vergis A
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1729-1739. PubMed ID: 28917006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of synoptic operation reports in colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
Nikolic A; Tranter-Entwistle I; McCombie A; Connor S; Eglinton T
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2024 Apr; 39(1):63. PubMed ID: 38689196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Histopathological Reporting in Breast Cancer: Results From Four South African Breast Units.
Toma A; O'Neil D; Joffe M; Ayeni O; Nel C; van den Berg E; Nayler S; Cubasch H; Phakathi B; Buccimazza I; Čačala S; Ruff P; Norris S; Nietz S
JCO Glob Oncol; 2021 Jan; 7():72-80. PubMed ID: 33434068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands.
van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Willems SM; Kuijpers CCHJ; van der Wall E; Overbeek LIH; Deckers IAG
Int J Cancer; 2020 Feb; 146(3):769-780. PubMed ID: 30977119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
Hammond EH; Flinner RL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reports - so what and who cares? A population-based satisfaction survey of 970 pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists.
Lankshear S; Srigley J; McGowan T; Yurcan M; Sawka C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1599-602. PubMed ID: 23432456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Quality of Rectal Cancer Pathology Reports in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-04/NRG Oncology.
Sho S; Yothers G; Colangelo LH; Ganz PA; O'Connell MJ; Beart RW; Hemmelgarn M; Chen FC; Ko CY; Russell MM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32692071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The format type has impact on the quality of pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens.
Aumann K; Kayser G; Amann D; Bronsert P; Hauschke D; Palade E; Passlick B; Werner M
Lung Cancer; 2013 Sep; 81(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 23790451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic synoptic reporting: assessing the completeness of synoptic and narrative reports for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Vergis A; Stogryn SE; Mullan MJ; Hardy K
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 28433464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
