These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36310563)
1. Traction-Internal Rotation Radiograph Can Improve Agreement in AO/OTA Classification System for Intertrochanteric Fracture. Jiamton C; Sayan P; Rungchamrussopa P; Kittithamvongs P Indian J Orthop; 2022 Nov; 56(11):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 36310563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The internal rotation traction radiograph does not improve the reliability in the AO classification system for pertrochanteric fractures. An inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment. Perez-Abdala JI; Huespe I; Vildoza S; Novillo M; Llano L; Carabelli G; Taype D; Sancineto C; Barla J Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110779. PubMed ID: 38143126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does a traction-internal rotation radiograph help to better evaluate fractures of the proximal femur? Koval KJ; Oh CK; Egol KA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18537778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Usefulness of CT Scan in AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study. Raj RY; Srivastava A; Aggarwal AN; Haq RU Indian J Orthop; 2022 Mar; 56(3):392-398. PubMed ID: 35251502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior Protrusion Measures (PPM) as an Innovative Index in Classifying Plain Lateral Radiograph Images of Pertrochanteric Fracture Using the Revised AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) Classification. Noda M; Takahara S; Inui A; Oe K; Osawa S; Matsushita T Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32898. PubMed ID: 36699794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer Agreement and Reproducibility of Pertrochanteric Fracture Classification Using Plain Radiograph Versus Computed Tomogram Images: A Study of 523 Patients. Noda M; Takahara S; Inui A; Osawa S; Matsushita T Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48413. PubMed ID: 38073949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations. Zarie M; Mohamoud MF; Farhoud AR; Bagheri N; Khan FMY; Heshmatifar M; Klantar H Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 30(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 33911837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures. Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traction radiographs versus CT in the evaluation of fracture morphology and consecutive treatment decisions in OTA/AO 43C3 fractures. Misir A; Kizkapan TB; Yildiz KI; Uzun E; Ozcamdalli M Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):332-336. PubMed ID: 30449460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography. Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-observer reliability assessment of the Schatzker, AO/OTA and three-column classification of tibial plateau fractures. Zhu Y; Hu CF; Yang G; Cheng D; Luo CF J Trauma Manag Outcomes; 2013 Sep; 7(1):7. PubMed ID: 24025650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification. Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effectiveness validation of a novel comprehensive classification for intertrochanteric fractures]. Cui L; Liu H; Wang J; Fan H; Wang D; Wang S; Song C Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 37(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 37070307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation. Klaber I; Besa P; Sandoval F; Lobos D; Zamora T; Schweitzer D; Urrutia J Injury; 2021 Jan; 52(1):102-105. PubMed ID: 32654847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register. Bergvall M; Bergdahl C; Ekholm C; Wennergren D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):587. PubMed ID: 34174861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Traction images heavily influence lateral wall measurement in trochanteric hip fractures. A prospective study. Carmona M; Gonzalez N; Segovia J; de Amesti M; Zamora T; Schweitzer D Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110724. PubMed ID: 38143142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify. Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study. Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]