127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36311403)
1. Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance.
Gonnerman M; Linden DW; Shea SA; Sullivan K; Kamath P; Blomberg E
Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9444. PubMed ID: 36311403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lincoln estimates of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) abundance in North America.
Alisauskas RT; Arnold TW; Leafloor JO; Otis DL; Sedinger JS
Ecol Evol; 2014 Jan; 4(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 24558569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian analysis of wildlife age-at-harvest data.
Conn PB; Diefenbach DR; Laake JL; Ternent MA; White GC
Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1170-7. PubMed ID: 18266894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial and complete dependency among data sets has minimal consequence on estimates from integrated population models.
Weegman MD; Arnold TW; Clark RG; Schaub M
Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2258. PubMed ID: 33176007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrated population modeling of black bears in Minnesota: implications for monitoring and management.
Fieberg JR; Shertzer KW; Conn PB; Noyce KV; Garshelis DL
PLoS One; 2010 Aug; 5(8):e12114. PubMed ID: 20711344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A more reliable species richness estimator based on the Gamma-Poisson model.
Chiu CH
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14540. PubMed ID: 36632143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for tagging-to-harvest mortality in a Brownie tag-recovery model by incorporating radio-telemetry data.
Buderman FE; Diefenbach DR; Casalena MJ; Rosenberry CS; Wallingford BD
Ecol Evol; 2014 Apr; 4(8):1439-50. PubMed ID: 24834339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the importance of demographic parameters for population dynamics using Bayesian integrated population modeling.
Eacker DR; Lukacs PM; Proffitt KM; Hebblewhite M
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1280-1293. PubMed ID: 28188660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance.
Clare J; McKinney ST; DePue JE; Loftin CS
Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2031-2047. PubMed ID: 28644579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extending the Lincoln-Petersen estimator for multiple identifications in one source.
Köse T; Orman M; Ikiz F; Baksh MF; Gallagher J; Böhning D
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4237-49. PubMed ID: 24833434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of camera trap-based abundance estimators for unmarked populations.
Amburgey SM; Yackel Adams AA; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Siers SR; McClintock BT; Converse SJ
Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02410. PubMed ID: 34255398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial and temporal variation in harvest probabilities for American black duck.
Roy C; Cumming SG; McIntire EJ
Ecol Evol; 2015 May; 5(10):1992-2004. PubMed ID: 26045951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An integrated population model for bird monitoring in North America.
Ahrestani FS; Saracco JF; Sauer JR; Pardieck KL; Royle JA
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 28036137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision gain versus effort with joint models using detection/non-detection and banding data.
Sanderlin JS; Block WM; Strohmeyer BE; Saab VA; Ganey JL
Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(2):804-817. PubMed ID: 30766670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferences about population dynamics from count data using multistate models: a comparison to capture-recapture approaches.
Zipkin EF; Sillett TS; Grant EH; Chandler RB; Royle JA
Ecol Evol; 2014 Feb; 4(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 24634726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robustness of close-kin mark-recapture estimators to dispersal limitation and spatially varying sampling probabilities.
Conn PB; Bravington MV; Baylis S; Ver Hoef JM
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(12):5558-5569. PubMed ID: 32607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
