These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3631183)

  • 1. The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1.
    Goldstick BJ; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 Sep; 104(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 3631183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds.
    Weinreb RN; Perlman JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Jun; 101(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 3717255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population-based assessment of sensitivity and specificity of a pinhole for detection of significant refractive errors in the community.
    Marmamula S; Keeffe JE; Narsaiah S; Khanna RC; Rao GN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 24909916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal values of short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Mojon DS; Zulauf M
    Ophthalmologica; 2003; 217(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 12792131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optic disc photogrammetry: magnification factors for eye position, centration, and ametropias, refractive and axial; and their application in the diagnosis of optic nerve hypoplasia.
    Pach J; Pennell DO; Romano PE
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 21(12):454-62. PubMed ID: 2627096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre- and Postcycloplegic Refractions in Children and Adolescents.
    Zhu D; Wang Y; Yang X; Yang D; Guo K; Guo Y; Jing X; Pan CW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167628. PubMed ID: 27907165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cycloplegia on the refractive status of children: the Shandong children eye study.
    Hu YY; Wu JF; Lu TL; Wu H; Sun W; Wang XR; Bi HS; Jonas JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117482. PubMed ID: 25658329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term refractive change and ocular parameter changes after cycloplegia.
    Cheng HC; Hsieh YT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1113-7. PubMed ID: 25036542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of refractive outcomes after implantation of two types of intraocular lenses with different diopter intervals (0.25 diopter versus 0.50 diopter).
    Kim M; Eom Y; Song JS; Kim HM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):176. PubMed ID: 30021633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of refractive correction on the accuracy of frequency-doubling technology Matrix.
    Contestabile MT; Perdicchi A; Amodeo S; Paffetti L; Iester M; Recupero SM
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):413-5. PubMed ID: 23632396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
    Lin Z; Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Zhou HJ; Mao GY; Wang NL; Liang YB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 28503812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of partial and full correction of refractive errors on sensorial and motor outcomes in children with refractive accommodative esotropia.
    Sefi-Yurdakul N; Kaykısız H; Koç F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 39(4):883-890. PubMed ID: 29549487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refraction in children: a comparison of two methods of accommodation control.
    Hopkins S; Sampson GP; Hendicott P; Lacherez P; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1734-9. PubMed ID: 23142881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.
    Sankaridurg P; He X; Naduvilath T; Lv M; Ho A; Smith E; Erickson P; Zhu J; Zou H; Xu X
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e633-e640. PubMed ID: 29110438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peripheral refractive correction and automated perimetric profiles.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Crews SJ
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Jun; 66(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 10994444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population prevalence of tilted optic disks and the relationship of this sign to refractive error.
    Vongphanit J; Mitchell P; Wang JJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 May; 133(5):679-85. PubMed ID: 11992866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In kinetic perimetry high refractive errors also influence the isopter position outside the central 30 degrees].
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Apr; 219(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 12022001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target refraction for best uncorrected distance and near vision in cataract surgery.
    Schuster AK; Schlichtenbrede FC; Harder BC; Beutelspacher SC; Jonas JB
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 24366766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.