202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36312231)
1. Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression as predictive models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia: A retrospective study.
Zheng D; Hao X; Khan M; Wang L; Li F; Xiang N; Kang F; Hamalainen T; Cong F; Song K; Qiao C
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():959649. PubMed ID: 36312231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.
Oosterhoff JHF; de Hond AAH; Peters RM; van Steenbergen LN; Sorel JC; Zijlstra WP; Poolman RW; Ring D; Jutte PC; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Putter H; Steyerberg EW; Doornberg JN;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38470976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A machine-learning-based algorithm improves prediction of preeclampsia-associated adverse outcomes.
Schmidt LJ; Rieger O; Neznansky M; Hackelöer M; Dröge LA; Henrich W; Higgins D; Verlohren S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):77.e1-77.e30. PubMed ID: 35114187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Hao X; Zheng D; Khan M; Wang L; Hämäläinen T; Cong F; Xu H; Song K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36832100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the Risk of Adverse Events in Pregnant Women With Congenital Heart Disease.
Chu R; Chen W; Song G; Yao S; Xie L; Song L; Zhang Y; Chen L; Zhang X; Ma Y; Luo X; Liu Y; Sun P; Zhang S; Fang Y; Dong T; Zhang Q; Peng J; Zhang L; Wei Y; Zhang W; Su X; Qiao X; Song K; Yang X; Kong B
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jul; 9(14):e016371. PubMed ID: 32662348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods.
Jhee JH; Lee S; Park Y; Lee SE; Kim YA; Kang SW; Kwon JY; Park JT
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221202. PubMed ID: 31442238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a prediction model on preeclampsia using machine learning-based method: a retrospective cohort study in China.
Liu M; Yang X; Chen G; Ding Y; Shi M; Sun L; Huang Z; Liu J; Liu T; Yan R; Li R
Front Physiol; 2022; 13():896969. PubMed ID: 36035487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effects of imputation methods for missing data in predictive modelling of cohort study datasets.
Li J; Guo S; Ma R; He J; Zhang X; Rui D; Ding Y; Li Y; Jian L; Cheng J; Guo H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):41. PubMed ID: 38365610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Time Horizon on Classification Accuracy: Application of Machine Learning to Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease.
Simon S; Mandair D; Albakri A; Fohner A; Simon N; Lange L; Biggs M; Mukamal K; Psaty B; Rosenberg M
JMIR Cardio; 2022 Nov; 6(2):e38040. PubMed ID: 36322114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.
Du Z; Yang Y; Zheng J; Li Q; Lin D; Li Y; Fan J; Cheng W; Chen XH; Cai Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17257. PubMed ID: 32628616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of insufficient hepatic enhancement during the Hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB DTPA-enhanced MRI using machine learning classifier and feature selection algorithms.
Ko JS; Byun J; Park S; Woo JY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jan; 47(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 34647145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gradient boosted trees with individual explanations: An alternative to logistic regression for viability prediction in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Vaulet T; Al-Memar M; Fourie H; Bobdiwala S; Saso S; Pipi M; Stalder C; Bennett P; Timmerman D; Bourne T; De Moor B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106520. PubMed ID: 34808532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality risk prediction in burn injury: Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning approaches.
Stylianou N; Akbarov A; Kontopantelis E; Buchan I; Dunn KW
Burns; 2015 Aug; 41(5):925-34. PubMed ID: 25931158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.
Shirwaikar RD; Acharya U D; Makkithaya K; M S; Srivastava S; Lewis U LES
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 31521253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic stress in practice assistants: An analytic approach comparing four machine learning classifiers with a standard logistic regression model.
Bozorgmehr A; Thielmann A; Weltermann B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250842. PubMed ID: 33945572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of metabolic and pre-metabolic syndromes using machine learning models with anthropometric, lifestyle, and biochemical factors from a middle-aged population in Korea.
Kim J; Mun S; Lee S; Jeong K; Baek Y
BMC Public Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):664. PubMed ID: 35387629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine-Learning vs. Expert-Opinion Driven Logistic Regression Modelling for Predicting 30-Day Unplanned Rehospitalisation in Preterm Babies: A Prospective, Population-Based Study (EPIPAGE 2).
Reed RA; Morgan AS; Zeitlin J; Jarreau PH; Torchin H; Pierrat V; Ancel PY; Khoshnood B
Front Pediatr; 2020; 8():585868. PubMed ID: 33614539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques.
Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
