These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36312621)

  • 1. An In Vitro Study Comparing the Diametral Tensile Strength of Composite Core Build-Up Material With Three Different Prefabricated Post Systems.
    Meena KK; Sharma V; Jaiswal RK; Madaan R; Gupta M; Jaswal S
    Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29560. PubMed ID: 36312621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study.
    Coelho Santos G; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 15116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diametral tensile strength of composite core material with cured and uncured fiber posts.
    Passos SP; Santos MJ; El-Mowafy O; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):125-8; quiz 129-30. PubMed ID: 21903522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
    Solomon CS; Osman YI
    SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and conventional cast post: An in vitro study.
    Choudhary S; Begum Z; Choudhary P; Tripathi S
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2014 May; 4(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 25254191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture toughness, vibration modal analysis and viscoelastic behavior of Kevlar, glass, and carbon fiber/epoxy composites for dental-post applications.
    Fouad H; Mourad AI; ALshammari BA; Hassan MK; Abdallah MY; Hashem M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jan; 101():103456. PubMed ID: 31590059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth.
    Pereira JR; do Valle AL; Shiratori FK; Ghizoni JS; Bonfante EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1225-30. PubMed ID: 24836285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts.
    Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.
    Franco EB; Lins do Valle A; Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL; Rubo JH; Pereira JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 24161260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of water immersion on the mechanical properties of fiber posts.
    Komada W; Inagaki T; Ueda Y; Omori S; Hosaka K; Tagami J; Miura H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Jan; 61(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 27324293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Fabrication Technique and Thermal Cycling on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Milled Custom Fit Anatomical Post and Cores: An In Vitro Study.
    Eid RY; Koken S; Baba NZ; Ounsi H; Ferrari M; Salameh Z
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Oct; 28(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 31397947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.
    Yenisey M; Kulunk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 18182184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study.
    Vadavadagi SV; Dhananjaya KM; Yadahalli RP; Lahari M; Shetty SR; Bhavana BL
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(3):205-208. PubMed ID: 28258265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Post-Core and Crown Type on the Fracture Resistance of Incisors Submitted to Quasistatic Loading.
    Uctasli S; Boz Y; Sungur S; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
    Polymers (Basel); 2021 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 33918203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts.
    Purton DG; Payne JA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 9063218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.