BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36314693)

  • 1. The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.
    Gray K; DiMaggio N; Schein C; Kachanoff F
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2023 Aug; 27(3):272-308. PubMed ID: 36314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people.
    Frimer JA; Biesanz JC; Walker LJ; MacKinlay CW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 104(6):1040-59. PubMed ID: 23586414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gut check: reappraisal of disgust helps explain liberal-conservative differences on issues of purity.
    Feinberg M; Antonenko O; Willer R; Horberg EJ; John OP
    Emotion; 2014 Jun; 14(3):513-21. PubMed ID: 24098928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No Absolutism Here: Harm Predicts Moral Judgment 30× Better Than Disgust-Commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016).
    Gray K; Schein C
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 11(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 27217244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.
    Wagemans FMA; Brandt MJ; Zeelenberg M
    Emotion; 2018 Mar; 18(2):277-289. PubMed ID: 28872334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
    Graham J; Haidt J; Nosek BA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):1029-46. PubMed ID: 19379034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A constructionist review of morality and emotions: no evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions.
    Cameron CD; Lindquist KA; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):371-94. PubMed ID: 25587050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum.
    Graham J; Nosek BA; Haidt J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50092. PubMed ID: 23251357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Purity is not a distinct moral domain.
    Kollareth D; Russell JA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Oct; 46():e308. PubMed ID: 37789525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A bad taste in the mouth: gustatory disgust influences moral judgment.
    Eskine KJ; Kacinik NA; Prinz JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 21307274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disgust and the moralization of purity.
    Horberg EJ; Oveis C; Keltner D; Cohen AB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 97(6):963-76. PubMed ID: 19968413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.