201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36315238)
1. Clinicians' Perceptions of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Blood Utilization Calculator: Qualitative Exploratory Study.
Choudhury A; Asan O; Medow JE
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Oct; 9(4):e38411. PubMed ID: 36315238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing clinicians' willingness to use an AI-based clinical decision support system.
Choudhury A
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():920662. PubMed ID: 36339516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of risk, expectancy, and trust on clinicians' intent to use an artificial intelligence system -- Blood Utilization Calculator.
Choudhury A; Asan O; Medow JE
Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103708. PubMed ID: 35149301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study.
Shahsavar Y; Choudhury A
JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 May; 10():e47564. PubMed ID: 37195756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians' Perspectives on AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study of the CURATE.AI Personalized Dose Optimization Platform.
Vijayakumar S; Lee VV; Leong QY; Hong SJ; Blasiak A; Ho D
JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 Oct; 10():e48476. PubMed ID: 37902825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.
Choudhury A; Shamszare H
JMIR Hum Factors; 2024 May; 11():e55399. PubMed ID: 38801658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients' Views on AI for Risk Prediction in Shared Decision-Making for Knee Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Interview Study.
Gould DJ; Dowsey MM; Glanville-Hearst M; Spelman T; Bailey JA; Choong PFM; Bunzli S
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e43632. PubMed ID: 37721797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward an Ecologically Valid Conceptual Framework for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings: Need for Systems Thinking, Accountability, Decision-making, Trust, and Patient Safety Considerations in Safeguarding the Technology and Clinicians.
Choudhury A
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 9(2):e35421. PubMed ID: 35727615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients' and Clinicians' Perceived Trust in Internet-of-Things Systems to Support Asthma Self-management: Qualitative Interview Study.
Hui CY; McKinstry B; Fulton O; Buchner M; Pinnock H
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jul; 9(7):e24127. PubMed ID: 34269684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Assessment of How Clinicians and Staff Members Use a Diabetes Artificial Intelligence Prediction Tool: Mixed Methods Study.
Liaw WR; Ramos Silva Y; Soltero EG; Krist A; Stotts AL
JMIR AI; 2023 May; 2():e45032. PubMed ID: 38875578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. User Satisfaction with an AI System for Chest X-Ray Analysis Implemented in a Hospital's Emergency Setting.
Rabinovich D; Mosquera C; Torrens P; Aineseder M; Benitez S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():8-12. PubMed ID: 35612006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The blood utilization calculator, a target-based electronic decision support algorithm, increases the use of single-unit transfusions in a large academic medical center.
Connor JP; Raife T; Medow JE; Ehlenfeldt BD; Sipsma K
Transfusion; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1689-1696. PubMed ID: 29717482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners.
Kocaballi AB; Ijaz K; Laranjo L; Quiroz JC; Rezazadegan D; Tong HL; Willcock S; Berkovsky S; Coiera E
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Nov; 27(11):1695-1704. PubMed ID: 32845984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicians' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Workload, Risk, Trust, Clinical Decision Making, and Clinical Integration.
Shamszare H; Choudhury A
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 37628506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.
Helman S; Terry MA; Pellathy T; Hravnak M; George E; Al-Zaiti S; Clermont G
Appl Clin Inform; 2023 Aug; 14(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 37793618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barriers to and Facilitators for Acceptance of Comprehensive Clinical Decision Support System-Driven Care Maps for Patients With Thoracic Trauma: Interview Study Among Health Care Providers and Nurses.
Jones EK; Banks A; Melton GB; Porta CM; Tignanelli CJ
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 9(1):e29019. PubMed ID: 35293873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. User-Centered Design of A Novel Risk Prediction Behavior Change Tool Augmented With an Artificial Intelligence Engine (MyDiabetesIQ): A Sociotechnical Systems Approach.
Shields C; Cunningham SG; Wake DJ; Fioratou E; Brodie D; Philip S; Conway NT
JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Feb; 9(1):e29973. PubMed ID: 35133280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revolutionising dental technologies: a qualitative study on dental technicians' perceptions of Artificial intelligence integration.
Lin GSS; Ng YS; Ghani NRNA; Chua KH
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):690. PubMed ID: 37749537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinicians' Role in the Adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and Its Implications for Organizational Practices: Qualitative Case Study.
Jacob C; Sanchez-Vazquez A; Ivory C
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 May; 7(5):e13555. PubMed ID: 31066710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.
Dlugatch R; Georgieva A; Kerasidou A
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):42. PubMed ID: 37340408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]