BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36315247)

  • 1. Effects of Native Translation Frequency and L2 Proficiency on L2 word Recognition: Evidence from Korean Speakers of English as a Foreign Language.
    Baek H; Tae J; Lee Y; Choi W
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1325-1343. PubMed ID: 36315247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of lexical characteristics and talker accent on the recognition of English words by native speakers of Korean.
    Choi MK; Holliday JJ; Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):769. PubMed ID: 34470323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. THE INFLUENCE OF SYLLABIFICATION RULES IN L1 ON L2 WORD RECOGNITION.
    Choi W; Nam K; Lee Y
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):535-53. PubMed ID: 26340053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts.
    Van Hell JG; Dijkstra T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 12613683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translation norms for Malay and English words: The effects of word class, semantic variability, lexical characteristics, and language proficiency on translation.
    Lee ST; van Heuven WJB; Price JM; Leong CXR
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3585-3601. PubMed ID: 36219309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-linguistic similarity norms for Japanese-English translation equivalents.
    Allen D; Conklin K
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):540-63. PubMed ID: 24046264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proficiency versus lexical processing efficiency as a measure of L2 lexical quality: Individual differences in word-frequency effects in L2 visual word recognition.
    Baek H; Lee Y; Choi W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Nov; 51(8):1858-1869. PubMed ID: 37707723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chinese translation norms for 1,429 English words.
    Wen Y; van Heuven WJB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 27325164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The effects of associative strength between lexical and conceptual representations on word processing in second language learners].
    Habuchi Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Apr; 76(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15962583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of Translation-Ambiguous Words by Chinese-English Bilinguals in Sentence Context.
    Zhou G; Chen Y; Feng Y; Zhou R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Oct; 48(5):1133-1161. PubMed ID: 31127440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ERP measures of auditory word repetition and translation priming in bilinguals.
    Phillips NA; Klein D; Mercier J; de Boysson C
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1125(1):116-31. PubMed ID: 17113571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How L2 words are stored: the episodic L2 hypothesis.
    Witzel NO; Forster KI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1608-21. PubMed ID: 22545605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. L2-L1 Translation Priming Effects in a Lexical Decision Task: Evidence From Low Proficient Korean-English Bilinguals.
    Lee Y; Jang E; Choi W
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():267. PubMed ID: 29599733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language dominance and order of acquisition affect auditory translation priming in heritage speakers.
    Soo R; Monahan PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):284-293. PubMed ID: 35306939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.
    Ishida T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):523-536. PubMed ID: 29168115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Translation norms for English and Spanish: the role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity.
    Prior A; MacWhinney B; Kroll JF
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Nov; 39(4):1029-38. PubMed ID: 18183923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic spatial organization of the occipito-temporal word form area for second language processing.
    Gao Y; Sun Y; Lu C; Ding G; Guo T; Malins JG; Booth JR; Peng D; Liu L
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():20-28. PubMed ID: 28610849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the potential influence of crosslinguistic lexical similarity on word-choice transfer in L2 English.
    Shatz I; Alexopoulou T; Murakami A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281137. PubMed ID: 36724191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Production of lexical stress in non-native speakers of American English: kinematic correlates of stress and transfer.
    Chakraborty R; Goffman L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):821-35. PubMed ID: 21106699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing advantage for emotional words in bilingual speakers.
    Ponari M; Rodríguez-Cuadrado S; Vinson D; Fox N; Costa A; Vigliocco G
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):644-52. PubMed ID: 25893450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.