295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36315284)
1. Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Wlodarczyk J; Brabender D; Gupta A; Gaur K; Madiedo A; Lee SW; Hsieh C
Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 36315284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
Marra AA; Campennì P; De Simone V; Parello A; Litta F; Ratto C
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Jul; 27(7):551-557. PubMed ID: 36802041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review.
Albayati S; Chen P; Morgan MJ; Toh JWT
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Jun; 23(6):529-535. PubMed ID: 31254202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rondelli F; Bugiantella W; Villa F; Sanguinetti A; Boni M; Mariani E; Avenia N
Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 2():S153-S159. PubMed ID: 25157988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external or internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Pääkkö E; Biancari F; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1010-1015. PubMed ID: 26919191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.
Faucheron JL; Trilling B; Barbois S; Sage PY; Waroquet PA; Reche F
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 27530905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center.
van Iersel JJ; Formijne Jonkers HA; Paulides TJC; Verheijen PM; Draaisma WA; Consten ECJ; Broeders IAMJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1215-1223. PubMed ID: 28991087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.
Ramage L; Georgiou P; Tekkis P; Tan E
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jul; 19(7):381-9. PubMed ID: 26041559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time.
Heemskerk J; de Hoog DE; van Gemert WG; Baeten CG; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1825-30. PubMed ID: 17690936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Klintrup K; Takala H; Vierimaa M; Ohtonen P; Mäkelä J
Tech Coloproctol; 2014 Feb; 18(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 23839795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Perrenot C; Germain A; Scherrer ML; Ayav A; Brunaud L; Bresler L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jul; 56(7):909-14. PubMed ID: 23739199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis on current status, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse treatment: can robotic surgery become the gold standard?
Bao X; Wang H; Song W; Chen Y; Luo Y
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Aug; 36(8):1685-1694. PubMed ID: 33646353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation?
Mantoo S; Podevin J; Regenet N; Rigaud J; Lehur PA; Meurette G
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e469-75. PubMed ID: 23895633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J; Rautio T; Ohinmaa A; Koivurova S; Ohtonen P; Sintonen H; Mäkelä J
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 May; 23(5):461-470. PubMed ID: 31069557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.
van der Schans EM; Verheijen PM; Moumni ME; Broeders IAMJ; Consten ECJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):2096-2104. PubMed ID: 33835255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Warrier SK; Heriot A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Aug; 36(8):1621-1631. PubMed ID: 33718972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?
Mehmood RK; Parker J; Bhuvimanian L; Qasem E; Mohammed AA; Zeeshan M; Grugel K; Carter P; Ahmed S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1113-8. PubMed ID: 24965859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Chaoui AM; Chaoui I; Olivier F; Geers J; Abasbassi M
Acta Chir Belg; 2024 Apr; 124(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 36905354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.
Inaba CS; Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Koh CY; Jafari MD; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):667-671. PubMed ID: 28871416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution of male rectal prolapse surgery and initial experience of robotic rectopexy in men.
Siddika A; Saha S; Siddiqi S
J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 27830430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
