266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36316615)
1. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.
Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; Leuthold H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 35980705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?
Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38914923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.
Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Miller J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):810-836. PubMed ID: 33269440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
Lee PS; Sewell DK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.
Bräutigam LC; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):91-114. PubMed ID: 37548866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The time-course of distractor-based activation modulates effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs in conflict tasks.
Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG; Ulrich R
Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):837-854. PubMed ID: 34918279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
Hübner R; Töbel L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning.
Shi K; Wang L
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):866-882. PubMed ID: 38413504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interacting congruency effects in the hybrid Stroop-Simon task prevent conclusions regarding the domain specificity or generality of the congruency sequence effect.
Weissman DH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):945-967. PubMed ID: 31580121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.
Pratte MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 33155124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task?
Burle B; Spieser L; Servant M; Hasbroucq T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 24302468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.
Keye D; Wilhelm O; Oberauer K; van Ravenzwaaij D
Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):762-76. PubMed ID: 19034502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.
Bugg JM
Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1217-27. PubMed ID: 18927038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A bimodal extension of the Eriksen flanker task.
Ulrich R; Prislan L; Miller J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):790-799. PubMed ID: 33179215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task.
Mittelstädt V; Leuthold H; Mackenzie IG
Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1768-1783. PubMed ID: 36403176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
