These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36316723)

  • 61. Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography scans.
    Branchini M; Broggi S; Dell'Oca I; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R; Di Muzio NG; Fiorino C
    Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 8():44-50. PubMed ID: 33458416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. SU-E-J-201: What is the Importance of Dose Recalculation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Dose Assessment?
    Pukala J; Staton R; Langen K
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part9):3699. PubMed ID: 28519011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.
    Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Megavoltage computed tomography image-based low-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical carcinoma.
    Wagner TH; Langen KM; Meeks SL; Willoughby TR; Zeidan OA; Staton RJ; Shah AP; Manon RR; Kupelian PA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Apr; 8(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 19334793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning.
    Barateau A; De Crevoisier R; Largent A; Mylona E; Perichon N; Castelli J; Chajon E; Acosta O; Simon A; Nunes JC; Lafond C
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4683-4693. PubMed ID: 32654160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments.
    Langen KM; Zhang Y; Andrews RD; Hurley ME; Meeks SL; Poole DO; Willoughby TR; Kupelian PA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1517-24. PubMed ID: 16029814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation.
    Richter A; Hu Q; Steglich D; Baier K; Wilbert J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
    Radiat Oncol; 2008 Dec; 3():42. PubMed ID: 19087250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.
    Scholey J; Vinas L; Kearney V; Yom S; Larson PEZ; Descovich M; Sudhyadhom A
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35417903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Quantitative evaluation of image quality of megavoltage computed tomography for guiding helical tomotherapy].
    Huang YL; Li CG; Mao K; Wu JA; Dai TT; Han YY; Wu H; Wang HY; Zhang YB
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Jun; 51(3):525-529. PubMed ID: 31209426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Consistency check of planned adaptive option on helical tomotherapy.
    Schirm M; Yartsev S; Bauman G; Battista J; Van Dyk J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 7(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 19044321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Estimation of setup uncertainty using planar and MVCT imaging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Santanam L; Esthappan J; Mutic S; Klein EE; Goddu SM; Chaudhari S; Wahab S; El Naqa IM; Low DA; Grigsby PW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1511-7. PubMed ID: 18538499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of kV-CBCT based 3D dose calculation accuracy and its validation using delivery fluence derived dose metrics in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Shinde P; Jadhav A; Shankar V; Gupta KK; Dhoble NS; Dhoble SJ
    Phys Med; 2022 Apr; 96():32-45. PubMed ID: 35217498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dose perturbation caused by metallic port in breast tissue expander in proton beam therapy.
    Zhao L; Moskvin VP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Nov; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 34035189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films.
    Mege JP; Wenzhao S; Veres A; Auzac G; Diallo I; Lefkopoulos D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):143-157. PubMed ID: 26894346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Clinical implementation of dose reconstruction and dose-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy for helical tomotherapy].
    Yao W; Xu S; Du Lei ; Xie C; Ma L
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 36(5):375-7. PubMed ID: 23289347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Endobiliary stent: marker for patient alignment in image-guided radiotherapy in pancreatic and periampullary cancers.
    Shukla P; Engineer R; Chopra S; Shrivastava SK
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2013 Dec; 44(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 23733213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of MVCT protocols for brain and head and neck tumor patients treated with helical tomotherapy.
    Vaandering A; Lee JA; Renard L; Grégoire V
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19515441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Assessment of image quality and dose calculation accuracy on kV CBCT, MV CBCT, and MV CT images for urgent palliative radiotherapy treatments.
    Held M; Cremers F; Sneed PK; Braunstein S; Fogh SE; Nakamura J; Barani I; Perez-Andujar A; Pouliot J; Morin O
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):279-290. PubMed ID: 27074487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Characterization of imaging performance of a novel helical kVCT for use in image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy.
    Tegtmeier RC; Ferris WS; Bayouth JE; Miller JR; Culberson WS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 23(6):e13648. PubMed ID: 35570390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Localization and quantification of the delivered dose to the spinal cord. Predicting actual delivered dose during daily MVCT image-guided tomotherapy.
    Duma MN; Schuster T; Aswathanarayana N; Fromm LS; Molls M; Geinitz H; Kampfer S
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2013 Dec; 189(12):1026-31. PubMed ID: 24104870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.