BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36317686)

  • 21. Research gaps identified in Iran's health technology assessment reports.
    Mohtasham F; Yazdizadeh B; Mobinizadeh M
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2023 Dec; 21(1):132. PubMed ID: 38082442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. HARMONIZING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE MINI-HTA MODEL SUITABLE IN THE FRENCH CONTEXT?
    Martelli N; Devaux C; van den Brink H; Billaux M; Pineau J; Prognon P; Borget I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28580892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: HOW EXTENSIVE ARE THEIR SEARCHES?
    Wood H; Arber M; Glanville JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28343452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
    Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethics information retrieval in HTA: state of current practice.
    Horton J; DeJean D; Farrah K; Hodgson A; Kaunelis D; Walter M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Jul; 39(1):e43. PubMed ID: 37465961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLIED METHODS.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 30345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What's in a name? Developing definitions for common health technology assessment product types of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (inahta).
    Merlin T; Tamblyn D; Ellery B;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Oct; 30(4):430-7. PubMed ID: 25397872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surrogate outcomes in health technology assessment: an international comparison.
    Velasco Garrido M; Mangiapane S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 19619350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the quality of health technology assessment reports in a developing country.
    Sabermahani A; Yazdi-Feyzabadi V; Bashzar S
    East Mediterr Health J; 2023 Jul; 29(7):554-561. PubMed ID: 37553743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Many Miles to Go: A Systematic Review of the State of Cost-Utility Analyses in Brazil.
    Campolina AG; Rozman LM; Decimoni TC; Leandro R; Novaes HM; De Soárez PC
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 15(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 27798797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of HTA reports on health policy: a systematic review.
    Gerhardus A; Dintsios CM
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 1():Doc02. PubMed ID: 21289923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical soundness of health technology assessment reports in Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Yazdi-Feyzabadi V; Bashzar S
    East Mediterr Health J; 2023 Jul; 29(7):524-529. PubMed ID: 37553740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of surrogate outcomes in model-based cost-effectiveness analyses: a survey of UK Health Technology Assessment reports.
    Taylor RS; Elston J
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jan; 13(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-50. PubMed ID: 19203465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.