265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36318011)
1. Multiomics Characterization of the Canada Goose Fecal Microbiome Reveals Selective Efficacy of Simulated Metagenomes.
Gil JC; Hird SM
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0238422. PubMed ID: 36318011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive Assessment of 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing for Microbiome Profiling across Multiple Habitats.
Zhang W; Fan X; Shi H; Li J; Zhang M; Zhao J; Su X
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0056323. PubMed ID: 37102867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RiboFR-Seq: a novel approach to linking 16S rRNA amplicon profiles to metagenomes.
Zhang Y; Ji P; Wang J; Zhao F
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jun; 44(10):e99. PubMed ID: 26984526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shallow shotgun sequencing of the microbiome recapitulates 16S amplicon results and provides functional insights.
Stothart MR; McLoughlin PD; Poissant J
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):549-564. PubMed ID: 36112078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison Between Full-Length 16S rRNA Metabarcoding and Whole Metagenome Sequencing Suggests the Use of Either Is Suitable for Large-Scale Microbiome Studies.
Rubiola S; Macori G; Civera T; Fanning S; Mitchell M; Chiesa F
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2022 Jul; 19(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 35819265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Assessment of Shotgun Metagenomics and 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing in the Study of Human Gut Microbiome.
Laudadio I; Fulci V; Palone F; Stronati L; Cucchiara S; Carissimi C
OMICS; 2018 Apr; 22(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 29652573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-Apo improves accuracy of 16S-amplicon-based prediction of microbiome function.
Jing G; Zhang Y; Cui W; Liu L; Xu J; Su X
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):9. PubMed ID: 33407112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metagenomic sequencing reveals swine lung microbial communities and metagenome-assembled genomes associated with lung lesions-a pilot study.
Li J; Huang T; Zhang M; Tong X; Chen J; Zhang Z; Huang F; Ai H; Huang L
Int Microbiol; 2023 Nov; 26(4):893-906. PubMed ID: 36933182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of
Hugerth LW; Pereira M; Zha Y; Seifert M; Kaldhusdal V; Boulund F; Krog MC; Bashir Z; Hamsten M; Fransson E; Svarre-Nielsen H; Schuppe-Koistinen I; Engstrand L
mSphere; 2020 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 33208514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrafast and accurate 16S rRNA microbial community analysis using Kraken 2.
Lu J; Salzberg SL
Microbiome; 2020 Aug; 8(1):124. PubMed ID: 32859275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbiome Analysis Reveals Diversity and Function of
Pimentel ZT; Dufault-Thompson K; Russo KT; Scro AK; Smolowitz RM; Gomez-Chiarri M; Zhang Y
mSphere; 2021 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 33980678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MicFunPred: A conserved approach to predict functional profiles from 16S rRNA gene sequence data.
Mongad DS; Chavan NS; Narwade NP; Dixit K; Shouche YS; Dhotre DP
Genomics; 2021 Nov; 113(6):3635-3643. PubMed ID: 34450292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Information Content of Shallow Shotgun Metagenomics.
Hillmann B; Al-Ghalith GA; Shields-Cutler RR; Zhu Q; Gohl DM; Beckman KB; Knight R; Knights D
mSystems; 2018; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 30443602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.
Ziesemer KA; Mann AE; Sankaranarayanan K; Schroeder H; Ozga AT; Brandt BW; Zaura E; Waters-Rist A; Hoogland M; Salazar-García DC; Aldenderfer M; Speller C; Hendy J; Weston DA; MacDonald SJ; Thomas GH; Collins MJ; Lewis CM; Hofman C; Warinner C
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16498. PubMed ID: 26563586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human reference gut microbiome catalog including newly assembled genomes from under-represented Asian metagenomes.
Kim CY; Lee M; Yang S; Kim K; Yong D; Kim HR; Lee I
Genome Med; 2021 Aug; 13(1):134. PubMed ID: 34446072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing.
Ranjan R; Rani A; Metwally A; McGee HS; Perkins DL
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Jan; 469(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 26718401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cultivation-independent genomes greatly expand taxonomic-profiling capabilities of mOTUs across various environments.
Ruscheweyh HJ; Milanese A; Paoli L; Karcher N; Clayssen Q; Keller MI; Wirbel J; Bork P; Mende DR; Zeller G; Sunagawa S
Microbiome; 2022 Dec; 10(1):212. PubMed ID: 36464731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the limits of 16S rRNA gene-based metagenome prediction and functional profiling.
Matchado MS; Rühlemann M; Reitmeier S; Kacprowski T; Frost F; Haller D; Baumbach J; List M
Microb Genom; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38421266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
