328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36318123)
1. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.
Verma N; Grossman D
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(2):119-120. PubMed ID: 37351896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2747-2750. PubMed ID: 38795713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Challenge of Emergency Abortion Care Following the Dobbs Ruling.
MacDonald A; Gershengorn HB; Ashana DC
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1691-1692. PubMed ID: 36318126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beneath the Sword of Damocles: Moral Obligations of Physicians in a Post-Dobbs Landscape.
Lyerly AD; Faden RR; Mello MM
Hastings Cent Rep; 2024 May; 54(3):15-27. PubMed ID: 38842894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Wells ES; Gomperts R; Scott JG
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1558-1564. PubMed ID: 38526865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.
Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comment on "Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry".
Woesner ME; Wilson SM
Acad Psychiatry; 2023 Dec; 47(6):689-690. PubMed ID: 38036936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "I Went Into This Field to Empower Other People, and I Feel Like I Failed": Residents Experience Moral Distress Post-
Turk JK; Claymore E; Dawoodbhoy N; Steinauer JE
J Grad Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 16(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 38882403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the Impacts of the Supreme Court Case FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.
Espey E; Hailstorks T; Hofler L
JAMA; 2024 May; 331(18):1529-1530. PubMed ID: 38526871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court's Abortion Exceptionalism - Judicial Deference, Medical Science, and Mifepristone Access.
Fox D; Cole E
N Engl J Med; 2021 Jun; 384(24):e94. PubMed ID: 33909959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After
Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
