These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36318192)

  • 1. Typical viewpoints of objects are better detected than atypical ones.
    Center EG; Gephart AM; Yang PL; Beck DM
    J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):1. PubMed ID: 36318192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
    Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints.
    Gomez P; Shutter J; Rouder JN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Oct; 15(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 18926985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints.
    Pilz KS; Konar Y; Vuong QC; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1958-65. PubMed ID: 21784094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No symmetry advantage when object matching involves accidental viewpoints.
    Koning A; van Lier R
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 15480756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural adaptation across viewpoint and exemplar in fusiform cortex.
    Harvey DY; Burgund ED
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Oct; 80(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 22626920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination.
    Hollingworth A; Henderson JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):319-43. PubMed ID: 10504886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: mental rotation as normalization?
    Willems B; Wagemans J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1090-115. PubMed ID: 11642697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1350-65. PubMed ID: 18927018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do simultaneously viewed objects influence scene recognition individually or as groups? Two perceptual studies.
    Gagne CR; MacEvoy SP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e102819. PubMed ID: 25119715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canonical views of dynamic scenes.
    Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Huff M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19170467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation discrimination and categorization of photographs of natural objects by pigeons.
    Jitsumori M; Ohkubo O
    Behav Processes; 1996 Dec; 38(3):205-26. PubMed ID: 24896482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the perception of objects and their orientations.
    De Caro SA
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(4):385-99. PubMed ID: 9749987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two?
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):568-81. PubMed ID: 10811163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the orientation of depth-rotated familiar objects.
    Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 18605505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic interference from objects both in and out of a scene context.
    Mathis KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):171-82. PubMed ID: 11827079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.