153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36318924)
1. Overview of laparoscopic surgery for cervical cancer in Japan: Updates after the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial.
Kobayashi E; Kakuda M; Ueda Y; Kimura T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jan; 49(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 36318924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
Bogani G; Di Donato V; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Chiantera V; Sozzi G; Golia D'Augè T; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; D'Oria O; Vizza E; Giannini A; On Behalf Of The Investigators Of The Italian Gynecological Cancer Study Group
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.
Pecorino B; D'Agate MG; Scibilia G; Scollo P; Giannini A; Di Donna MC; Chiantera V; Laganà AS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36293758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Kim S; Min KJ; Lee S; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 32467009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned?
Touhami O; Plante M
Curr Oncol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):1093-1106. PubMed ID: 35200592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
